Anne,
I would suggest using burial rather than cremation. Most cremations were
handled by the undertaker at the funeral home, and then the remains (the
ashes) were buried in the cemetery. You could use Cremation but leave the
date and place fields blank unless you knew where and when the cremation
, the notes referred to should be combined
into a single note.
As others have noted, the new default setting can be turned off.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jennifer Trahan
Sent: 28-Nov
help in deciding where to load a particular type of
file.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Jones
Sent: 17-Jul-08 3:33 PM
To: legacyusergroup
Subject: [LegacyUG] Pictures Documents
Now
Perhaps an area could be set up where users could submit their timeline
files (with a brief description and the originator's e-mail) for others to
download, but with a caveat that the timelines are not sanitized - use at
your own risk.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
The accessed date field is in the Citation Details portion since it will
change for each citation. However, Legacy inserts the accessed date
information into the same parentheses as the URL. Neat.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
should spend an hour or two comparing the models in both books to the
records you have collected (or are considering collecting) and see which
best suits your needs, prior to making the final decision.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
Legacy User Group guidelines
in due course.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janis
Gilmore
Sent: 4-Jun-08 8:04 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] accessed date
Just installed and opened
To the list:
Was an option ever considered for married name changes to place the maiden
names in parentheses and append the husband's surname, i.e. Jane Doe married
John Smith and her married name changed to Jane (Doe) Smith?
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
Robert57P via
would have to be
updated to support Unicode or another database product that does support
Unicode would have to be used, which would mean starting over almost from
scratch to code a new version of Legacy.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From
in the bibliography.) This appears in both the Source
detail preview and the Assigned Notes output as well as in the Descendant
Report, Modified Register footnote.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
[EMAIL
to Evidence Explained.
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http
Cathy,
Legacy Charting 7.0.094 was released as an update a few weeks ago. Those of
us with that update blind the upgrade code from installing 7.0.093 since it
is a lower release number.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
The URL should be
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jlog.html
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tish
Sent: 3-May-08 5:07 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
in a
note elsewhere.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christina
Sent: 20-Apr-08 6:46 PM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: [LegacyUG
for the
Alternate name in the Source data, or you can include the reason in a note
elsewhere.
Bill
Bill Bienia, PLCGS
www.CobblestoneLegacies.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christina
Sent: 20-Apr-08 6:46 PM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: [LegacyUG
- you
must create individual new sources for each entry.
Does anyone know it this behavior is fixed in version 7, i.e. can you do the
copy first then make changes?
Bill
William H. Bill Bienia, PLCGS
Cobblestone Legacies
Genealogy and Family History Services
PO Box 321, Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0
would only be common for a set of siblings.
Bill
William H. Bill Bienia, PLCGS
Cobblestone Legacies
Genealogy and Family History Services
PO Box 321, Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0
www.cobblestonelegacies.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm glad someone pointed out the difference in methods of showing the maiden
name between the US and the UK. I am now especially aware of this
difference. This is great.
Elizabeth,
In your case, there may be a way to get partway there today by doing two
things. First, insert your adopted name in
husband's surname.
While I wrote the above section on multiple married names, I'm not sure how
Legacy would handle that circumstance with the [WifeMarriedSurname]
variable. I would expect it would be the married surname in context of the
sentence.
Bill
William H. Bill Bienia, PLCGS
Cobblestone Legacies
them up later, then
remove the source at that time.
I hope this helps,
Bill
William H. Bill Bienia, PLCGS
Cobblestone Legacies
Genealogy and Family History Services
PO Box 321, Hillsburgh, ON N0B 1Z0
www.cobblestonelegacies.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Gary,
I was just setting something like this up this afternoon, where I wanted the
sentence to read (using your name examples):
Children of Seth and Irene (née SIMONSON) ANDREWS were:
I ended up using:
Children of [HusbFirstName] and [WifeFirstName] (née [WifeSurname])
[HusbSurname] were:
This
So a lumper splits the source-citations between the source details and
citations details (with multiple citation details per single source detail),
while a splitter lumps the complete source-citation into individual source
details and doesn't use the citation details at all? Also, when lumping,
22 matches
Mail list logo
