Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Evert van Dijken
In version 7 it's the same. No RIN 0 in the Name List if Alternate Names are On and with RIN 0 in the Name List if Alternate Names are Off. Evert 2008/9/24 Evert van Dijken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok, now I see. If I turn Alternate Names off I see RIN 0. > Evert > > 2008/9/24 Evert van Dijken <[EMA

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Evert van Dijken
Yes, see screenshot: http://www.xs4all.nl/~dijkene/name_list.png Evert 2008/9/24 Dennis M. Kowallek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:13:07 +0200, "Evert van Dijken" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Not in my copy of version 6 (build 6.0.0.190.) >>I see RIN 0 in the Index List, but not

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Evert van Dijken
Ok, now I see. If I turn Alternate Names off I see RIN 0. Evert 2008/9/24 Evert van Dijken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes, see screenshot: http://www.xs4all.nl/~dijkene/name_list.png > Evert > > 2008/9/24 Dennis M. Kowallek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:13:07 +0200, "Evert van Dijken"

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:13:07 +0200, "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Not in my copy of version 6 (build 6.0.0.190.) >I see RIN 0 in the Index List, but not in the Name List. The Name List >starts with RIN 1. I have the same build. Here is a screenshot... http://kowallekfamily.com/t

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread John Carter
I have Legacy 6.0.0.190 and the first entry in the name list is RIN 0. John > Not in my copy of version 6 (build 6.0.0.190.) > I see RIN 0 in the Index List, but not in the Name List. The Name List > starts with RIN 1. > Evert > > > 2008/9/24 Dennis M. Kowallek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Wed, 24

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Evert van Dijken
Not in my copy of version 6 (build 6.0.0.190.) I see RIN 0 in the Index List, but not in the Name List. The Name List starts with RIN 1. Evert 2008/9/24 Dennis M. Kowallek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:12:53 +0200, "Evert van Dijken" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The Name List

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:12:53 +0200, "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The Name List starts with RIN 1 In my copy of V6 I see a RIN 0 at the top. -- Dennis Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. Emails not of "Content-Type: text/plain" are deleted before ever reaching my inbox. --

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Evert van Dijken
The Name List starts with RIN 1 so I don't see why the Index couldn't start with RIN 1. I agree this is a (cosmetic) bug. Evert 2008/9/24 Dennis M. Kowallek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:08:12 +0100 (BST), "Jenny M Benson" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The word "bug" is usually

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:08:12 +0100 (BST), "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The word "bug" is usually used to mean something which the programmers did >not intend and would not wish to happen - in other words, a mistake. In this case, I would call it a (apparently cosmetic) bug. I am a

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-24 Thread Jenny M Benson
>>RIN 0 is used by Legacy to hold vital information relating to the use of >> the program, which is why you cannot delete it. > > And it should probably not be displayed on the Index tab. I would report > this as a bug. The word "bug" is usually used to mean something which the programmers did no

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-23 Thread Thomas Herson
Done! Tom Herson Ithaca, NY - Original Message - From: "Dennis M. Kowallek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:04 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:41:57 +0100, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-23 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:41:57 +0100, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >RIN 0 is used by Legacy to hold vital information relating to the use of the >program, which is why you cannot delete it. And it should probably not be displayed on the Index tab. I would report this as a bug. --

Re: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-23 Thread Thomas Herson
Thank you very much, Ron Tom Herson Ithaca, NY - Original Message - From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:41 AM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index Tom, RIN 0 is used by Legacy to hold vital informat

RE: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-23 Thread ronald ferguson
://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index >

[LegacyUG] "0" RIN in the Index

2008-09-23 Thread Thomas Herson
I am using the latest version of Legacy 7.0 I was just looking at the Index Report of my family file. When I sorted the report by RIN, there was a "0" as the first item in the RIN column. No information is displayed in any other column. When I tried to delete this RIN by highlighting the row