RE: [LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper?

2007-09-02 Thread ronald ferguson
ilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper? Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:32:29 -0400 (EDT) Am I correct in assuming that since Elizabeth Shown Mills includes the date a web page was accessed in the PUBLICATION FACTS, she leans towards "splitting? (meaning you can't re

RE: [LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper?

2007-09-01 Thread Kirsten Bowman
nal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ralf X Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 6:32 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper? Am I correct in assuming that since Elizabeth Shown Mills includes th

Re: [LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper?

2007-09-01 Thread Sharon Perdue
do it, but it is a LOT easier. Seems to me that SPLITTERS have to be flippers, too. ;-) - Original Message - From: "Ralf X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 9:32 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper? Am I cor

[LegacyUG] Elizabeth Shown Mills - Splitter or Lumper?

2007-09-01 Thread Ralf X
Am I correct in assuming that since Elizabeth Shown Mills includes the date a web page was accessed in the PUBLICATION FACTS, she leans towards "splitting? (meaning you can't reuse the Master Source later on) EXAMPLE:(http://www.bobswebpage.com/cemetery : accessed 01 September 2007), entry for Joh