I would like to thank everyone for their suggestions and their ideas. I
appreciate the offers.
I will more than likely add the 18th person in the Legacy database as I have
now further discovered that the eldest son, my GGG-Grandparents' 3rd child,
my GG-Granduncle William had eight children. By
scali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:53:57 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Individual Placement Issue... Help
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help...
/fergys/
_
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:36:24 -0500
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Individual Placement Issue... Help
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> Answering my own suggestion
Answering my own suggestion ;-)
Searching the 1871 census on ancestry.com for a female named Parker, born
about 1860, with mother Jane, and residence Todmorden and Walsden
Lancashire, finds a Nancy Parker, born about 1860 Lancashire, England.
The two previous entries are Ann, born about 1862, and
Another option is to attach the grandchild directly to the
grandparents. View Children List, change the status settings of the
child - you can add a category called "Grandchild". In reports, if you
include Child Status, then it will show it in parenthesis.
The downside is that generationally, in r
My preferred answer would be a daughter who falls in the gap between Anne
at 18 and Emma at 23 - especially since the others were born 2 years apart
and Sarah Jane's last name is different. Sarah Jane may only have been
staying with her grandmother for a few days.
This is where a "10 years previo
__
>
>
>
> ________
>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:53:57 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Individual Placement Issue.
Well you could add her as an unlinked individual but I wouldn't think
that would solve your problem. She'd certainly be floating but
wouldn't appear in any reports.
If you don't want to add "mother of Sarah", then the other
alternative is to choose the most likely mother and add notes
explai
Jim Smith wrote:
Help... Does anyone have a solution to my small problem?
I would like to enter a grand-daughter to an individual without adding a
"blank" or "unnamed" daughter, into my database Any suggestions?
I have not been able to determine which of the possible six; three
GG-Grandaunt
Subject: [LegacyUG] Individual Placement Issue... Help
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help... Does anyone have a solution to my small problem?
I would like to enter a grand-daughter to an individual without adding a
"blank" or "unnamed" daughter, into my database Any suggestions?
T
Help... Does anyone have a solution to my small problem?
I would like to enter a grand-daughter to an individual without adding a
"blank" or "unnamed" daughter, into my database Any suggestions?
The situation is that in 1881 the individual, my widowed
Step-GGG-Grandmother Jane (?) Parker has a G
11 matches
Mail list logo
