everything. If there is, I don't know of it.
Cary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Lewis
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 4:18 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Lewis
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 4:18 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
A lot of opinions re the use of "at" vs &q
_____
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> > Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:26:06 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
> >
> > A publisher (NEHGS in thi
A lot of opinions re the use of "at" vs "in", which totally ignores the
request of the OP and fails to answer her questions.
>I don't mind off-list responses with your opinions, but I don't want
>to start a debate on list about which preposition is best! LOL! My
>questions which should be add
p://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:26:06 -0500
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
>
> A publisher (NEHGS in this case) can specify (and potentially e
A publisher (NEHGS in this case) can specify (and potentially enforce) their
preferences for
the documents they handle. The English-speaking world, unlike France, has no
organization whose sole purpose is to keep the language "pure".
The differences between British English and other English spea
;
> - Original Message -
> From: ronald ferguson
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:45 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
>
>
>
> Exactly, Cathy.
>
> I was born in
r The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
> Date: Fri, 9
I think it is the "Non English and Horrible Grammar Society" :)
-Original Message-
I still think that the organisation (whatever it was called) should find
better/more constructive things to do!
Ron Ferguson
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version
: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
Exactly, Cathy.
I was born in A Hospital at Fountain Street in Manchester in Lancashire in
England.
Ron Ferguson
_
For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http
ov 2007 14:45:39 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
I have been editing an RTF generated file (Descendants Book) from Legacy
for the past month, and as I near the end, I am beginning to wonder how
consistent I have b
___
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:51:42 +
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
>
> ronald ferguson wrote
>>I was born in A Hospital at Fountain Street in Manc
ronald ferguson wrote
I was born in A Hospital at Fountain Street in Manchester in Lancashire
in England.
A small comment on that. I was born *in* a Nursing Home, but I was born
*at* Don't-know-the-name Nursing Home *in* Birkenhead.
Similarly, I'd say *at* 2 High Street or *in* High Street.
_
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:45:39 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
>
> I have been editing an RTF generated file (Descendants Book) from Legacy
> for the past month, and as I
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
>
> Hi Susan,
> Unless you are planning to submit to NEHGS, I wouldn't worry about it.
>
> From an Australian point of view, to use "born at Dalwallinu" rather
> than "b
___
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:35:57 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, it is the right of the NEHGS (or any other organization for that
matter) to tell everbody who submits a report to their organi
ber 08, 2007 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
Hi Susan,
Unless you are planning to submit to NEHGS, I wouldn't worry about it.
From an Australian point of view, to use "born at Dalwallinu" rather
than "born in Dalwallinu" sounds
Hi Susan,
Unless you are planning to submit to NEHGS, I wouldn't worry about it.
From an Australian point of view, to use "born at Dalwallinu" rather
than "born in Dalwallinu" sounds strange whereas "born at Dalwallinu
Hospital", "born at Honeysuckle Cottage" etc is more normal than using "in"
most
respected genealogical societies in the United States.
-Original Message-
From: ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 5:01 pm
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
usan,
I have no time for
: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Prepositions of In and At for locations
I have been editing an RTF generated file (Descendants Book) from Legacy for
the past month, and as I near the end, I am beginning to wonder how consistent
I have been with my prepositions. Legacy&#
I have been editing an RTF generated file (Descendants Book) from Legacy for
the past month, and as I near the end, I am beginning to wonder how
consistent I have been with my prepositions. Legacy's standard report is to
use the preposition "in" - i.e. "Chris was born in Boston on 1 Aug 1901."
The
21 matches
Mail list logo
