RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread ronald ferguson
/ _ > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:43:30 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7> > Thanks Robert and Ron -- just tried putting a new source (Ohio Deaths)> usin

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread GeoSci
e a mixture of the two and have yet to experience a problem >> >> Ron Ferguson >> >> >> >> >> > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:43 -0500 >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com >> > Subject: Re: [Lega

RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread Robert Carneal
500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7 > > Tim (or anyone else), > > You said: > > First of all, I personally am NOT going back through ALL of my sources to > > convert them to the SourceWrit

RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread ronald ferguson
/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _ > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:43 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] R

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread GeoSci
Tim (or anyone else), You said: > First of all, I personally am NOT going back through ALL of my sources to > convert them to the SourceWriter format. With tens of thousands of > citations, I would never get back to research if I solely concentrated on > his. Rather, when I'm adding new sources

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread Robert Carneal
A reply from Millennia would be more "official," but I think Millennia might be forced to back off from that. Upon investigating conversions, and realizing that we (we being legacy users) are often not consistent in sources, the conversion tools would misinterpret the old source when convertin

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread Tim Rosenlof
Subject: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7 Re: Source Template Conversion Tool. Can anyone help re the above in Version 7? According to the written manual I should be able to use this tool to convert my sources written in the "basic" format (in v.6) to the new "source writer" format

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-18 Thread Tim Rosenlof
Changed to text - Original Message - From: Prue Beck To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 11:44 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7 Geoff (If it wasn't Geoff, correct me) sent a email I do believe back in September explaining the Conversion

RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-17 Thread Kirsten Bowman
just doing a manual conversion of sources. There are discussions about methods for this in the archives. Kirsten -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Prue Beck Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:44 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [L

[LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2008-11-17 Thread Prue Beck
Re: Source Template Conversion Tool. Can anyone help re the above in Version 7? According to the written manual I should be able to use this tool to convert my sources written in the "basic" format (in v.6) to the new "source writer" format but I can't find the tool anywhere. I've followed the i

Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2007-11-05 Thread Robert57P via Gmail
m: DLevenick To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 3:32 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Re: Version 7 I was out of town and off list for much of October, and when I returned I emailed Legacy re. Version 7. If you (like me) are anxious for news, FYI, h

[LegacyUG] Re: Version 7

2007-11-05 Thread DLevenick
I was out of town and off list for much of October, and when I returned I emailed Legacy re. Version 7. If you (like me) are anxious for news, FYI, here is their reply: Denise _ From: Legacy Customer Service [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 6:44 PM To: 'Denis