Due to frequent intermarriages among my Scottish families back in the
1800's it has sometimes been necessary to put together entire families in
order to sort out the relationships, especially when the same Christian
names keep reappearing in the sibling families generation after generation.
The res
Hi Alice,
The only way I can think of doing this is via a Gedcom.
Search for those who are Related
Search > Find - Individual - Relationship - equal to - Related
Then tag these and export the tagged group and tick the box on the
export to add parents of tagged individuals.
If this is going to
Thanks, Cathy. That worked a treat, but the assigned tags didn't transfer.
Is there something I forgot to tick or is that just a consequence of the
GEDCOM? -- Alice
> [Original Message]
> From: Cathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/10/2006 1:14:51 PM
> Subjec
ust a consequence of the
GEDCOM? -- Alice
> [Original Message]
> From: Cathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/10/2006 1:14:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Shedding non-relatives
>
> Hi Alice,
> The only way I can think of doing this is via a Gedcom.
>
> Search
Couldn't she also use View-> Tree Finder and Tag everyone in her main
tree? The other families who aren't connected would be in their own
trees, wouldn't they?
Too bad you can't export from the Tree Finder, or create a new family
tree file from that window!
So perhaps another suggestion would be
I believe that putting two databases side by side and dragging what you want
to the other one, you have choices about what part of the related tree you
wish to move. That may help your problem.
Carl[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyF
On 9 Oct 2006 Susan Daily wrote:
> Too bad you can't export from the Tree Finder, or create a new family
> tree file from that window!
Using the Tree Finder you can tag everyone in one or more selected
tree(s) and then export them to a new family file.
Cheers, -- Dave N.
--
David Naylor, H
Hi Susan,
If I've understood Alice correctly, she can't do that as many of the
people she wants to shed *are* connected to her relatives as she has
followed many side lines and for this purpose wants to shed them.
Sorry Alice, I was thinking of other options that are included in
Gedcom export
0/2006 10:01:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Shedding non-relatives
>
> Hi Susan,
> If I've understood Alice correctly, she can't do that as many of the
> people she wants to shed *are* connected to her relatives as she has
> followed many side lines and for this purp
. Now you have
piqued my curiosity. -- Alice
> [Original Message]
> From: Dave Naylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 10/10/2006 1:46:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Shedding non-relatives
>
> On 9 Oct 2006 Susan Daily wrote:
>
> > Too bad you can't expo
ECTED] On Behalf Of Alice L
McVearry
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:03 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Shedding non-relatives
Thanks, Dave and Susan. It's something to explore. I'm not familiar with
Tree Finder or how to use it as I only have one t
11 matches
Mail list logo
