Thanks Ron
Thanks for the instructions. It's easy when you know how:-)
Result (as you said) "The total number of individuals given in the
Surnames list excludes "Private","
I guess that makes sense in a way, and has nothing to do with AKAs or
married names etc.
Off to have the half and the kip!
Ma
L PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
>
> Ron wrote
>
>> As above and then add a second search "AND" Individual; Tag No; Equal To;
>> Tagged; where "Tag No" is the tag for your Focus Gro
Ron wrote
> As above and then add a second search "AND" Individual; Tag No; Equal To;
> Tagged; where "Tag No" is the tag for your Focus Group.
Ah, well ... how do I tag my Focus Group?
(Sorry about this ... brain not up to par today)
Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.
surnames
>
> As others have said, the actual number of pages created is
> correct
>
> Jack
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mary Young
> Sent: 30 September 2008 08:27
> To: LegacyU
Mary Young wrote:
After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled "774 Individuals"
But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals ..."
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young
If you stop and think about it, the program m
lf Of Mary Young
Sent: 30 September 2008 08:27
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled "774 Individuals"
But the Surname Page in the set says &qu
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
>
> Ron and Evert
> Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
> I need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web
Ron and Evert
Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
I need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web pages.
Probably a bad hair day - or I'd be able to figure it out :-)
Mary
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
>
> Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
> 6. so I don't have the new "include invisible".
> I do have a l
Goto Search > Find > Detailed Search Tab and select:
Look for whom - Individual
Where to look - Private
How to look - Equal To
What to look for - Private
Evert
2008/9/30 Mary Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
> 6. so I don't have th
Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
6. so I don't have the new "include invisible".
I do have a lot of "Private" Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
How would I test this? Can't figure out how to Search a Focus Group
for Private Individuals.
Regards
Mary
N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:04:10 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Indi
I tested this with the sample file and without tagging "include
invisible ..." I got 145 individuals (from 158) and after tagging this
option I had 158 individuals in the Surname index. The strange thing
is that there are no invisible individuals in the sample file (there
are 13 private individuals
After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled "774 Individuals"
But the Surname Page in the set says "This site contains 650 Individuals ..."
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/
14 matches
Mail list logo
