On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT), Paula Ryburn
wrote:
>My goal was to "store" the images (which are pages for various localities in a
>county) at the detail level rather than at the master (county) level. In the
>future, I would have one source master per year/state/county, with the de
My goal was to "store" the images (which are pages for various localities in a
county) at the detail level rather than at the master (county) level. In the
future, I would have one source master per year/state/county, with the detail
citations indicating the locality, etc... that seems to
Ronald, That's how I thought it worked, too, because frankly it doesn't make
sense to do it any other way. There's probably a different explanation, and I
hope it is not "operator error" again. I would hate to have wasted people's
time on this list!
Thanks,
--Paula
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, ron
From: paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net
> Subject: [LegacyUG] image stored multiple times?
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
>
> Today I did some work "tidying up" my census master sources and citations.
>
> Last night after much consideration, I decided to keep the masters
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Paula Ryburn
wrote:
>Today I did some work "tidying up" my census master sources and citations.
>
>Last night after much consideration, I decided to keep the masters at the
>county level, and store either images or text at the detail citation level.
Today I did some work "tidying up" my census master sources and citations.
Last night after much consideration, I decided to keep the masters at the
county level, and store either images or text at the detail citation level.
Consequently, for about 10 master sources, this afternoon I "moved"
6 matches
Mail list logo
