relationships can get quite complicated!
Martin Briscoe
Fort William
MLFHS | Gwynedd FHS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John B. Lisle
Sent: 02 July 2008 18:49
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] The new
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] The new Invisible in Legacy 7
Pat,
Let me give you some insight from a beta tester on why
invisible status was added. As someone who uses Legacy to
prepare data that I publish on a web site, I am very
concerned with what I publish
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of ronald ferguson
Sent: 03 July 2008 11:47
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] The new Invisible in Legacy 7
Martin,
That should be the case - is it? Why not just make the child
invisible - unless there are other family problems
Martin,
This situation is where you use private marriage and private
child-parent relationship.
The relationship between your male family member (father) and the
mother should be marked as private. Mark his relationship with child
as private.
As the mother is visible to the family, she
Pat,
As it says, in theory everything is shown/printed as though that person never
existed. In other words there would be no place to put the word Living.
Ron Ferguson
_
New Blog: Free Contacts Database for use with Open
Pat Jones wrote
Has anyone used the invisible option for some people in their database
yet?
I hadn't done, but have just tried it, prompted by your question.
If so, is everything about the person including the name, etc., just
missing in a printout or is everythng except the name missing?
.
Martin Briscoe
Fort William
MLFHS | Gwynedd FHS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jenny M Benson
Sent: 02 July 2008 15:43
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] The new Invisible in Legacy 7
Curious why
7 matches
Mail list logo
