of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:04:10 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
CC
Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
6. so I don't have the new include invisible.
I do have a lot of Private Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
How would I test this? Can't figure out how to Search a Focus Group
for Private Individuals.
Regards
Mary
]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
Firstly, my apologies. I should have said I'm still working in VERSION
6. so I don't have the new include invisible.
I do have a lot of Private Individuals, so that's probably the answer.
How would I test
Ron and Evert
Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
I need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web pages.
Probably a bad hair day - or I'd be able to figure it out :-)
Mary
Legacy User Group guidelines:
]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
Ron and Evert
Thanks for search instructions. However, that searches my entire family file.
I need to search the _Focus Group_ used for my web pages.
Probably a bad hair day - or I'd be able to figure
I also get a similar discrepancy, but I believe that you can account for
this totally with the number of AKA's and married surnames
As others have said, the actual number of pages created is correct
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mary Young wrote:
After I generate my Legacy website (Pedigree pages), Legacy tells me
it's handled 774 Individuals
But the Surname Page in the set says This site contains 650 Individuals ...
Why the discrepancy in numbers?
Regards
Mary Young
If you stop and think about it, the program must
You are not mentioning the unknowns that maybe created for the webpage that the
program doesn't need to be filled for screen stuff. I am only guessing.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, Jack Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jack Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Web
Ron wrote
As above and then add a second search AND Individual; Tag No; Equal To;
Tagged; where Tag No is the tag for your Focus Group.
Ah, well ... how do I tag my Focus Group?
(Sorry about this ... brain not up to par today)
Mary Young
Legacy User Group guidelines:
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Web Pages - number of Individuals
Ron wrote
As above and then add a second search AND Individual; Tag No; Equal To;
Tagged; where Tag No is the tag for your Focus Group.
Ah, well ... how do I tag my Focus Group?
(Sorry about this ... brain not up
Thanks Ron
Thanks for the instructions. It's easy when you know how:-)
Result (as you said) The total number of individuals given in the
Surnames list excludes Private,
I guess that makes sense in a way, and has nothing to do with AKAs or
married names etc.
Off to have the half and the kip!
Mary
11 matches
Mail list logo
