> I have been very quiet while all of this discussion has been going on
>over bloodlines verses homosexual relationships.
That was working for me.
#
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Co
rday, September 08, 2007 6:39 PM
To: Evan Henderson; LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
I have been very quiet while all of this discussion
has been going on over bloodlines
No virus found in this outgoing mes
Jesus died for their
> sins as well as yours.
> Or are you hiding in a whale as Jonah did.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Darlene &
> Don Hicks
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:16 PM
> To: LegacyUse
Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Evan Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 8:39 pm
> Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
> Homosexual Entries
>
>
>
> I have been very qui
Sat, 8 Sep 2007 8:39 pm
Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
I have been very quiet while all of this discussion
has been going on over bloodlines verses homosexual
relationships. One of our moderators has stated that
the people who con
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Darlene &
> Don Hicks
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:16 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? -
> was Re:
Wayne
Martell
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
Joe:
By developing a program for genealogists only, as was
recommended/advocated by Bill Anderson, Millenia wou
AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
Legacy can handle these relationships. It is quite flexible. For
example:
On the family, pedigree, descendant, or index tab:
right click to add a spouse (even
PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
Joe:
By developing a program for genealogists only, as was recommended/advocated
by Bill Anderson, Millenia would be catering to the people who have a very
restricted
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:16 pm
Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line
I'd venture to guess that most current Legacy owners use only a fraction
of the features available. Legacy owners are no more obligated to use
every single feature now, then they will be in the future--regardless of
the changes to the program.
Dawn
Darlene & Don Hicks wrote:
s
ut of MY public institutions and my genealogy programs.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Darlene & Don Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:16 pm
> Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? -
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 6:16 pm
Subject: Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line
back as far as I can. I could care less about family
history o
What kind of record do you think you could find, going back to 1800,
indicating the sexual preferences of your ancestors?
If you are going to exclude homosexual couples because they don't have
children, you need to exclude childless couples.
I presume this list is moderated? It is inexcusable f
hange.
___
Wayne Martell
Victoria, BC, Canada
- Original Message -
From: joe Martin
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
Wayne,
Your example of a Genealogy Pr
cy: Family History or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
> Homosexual
> Entries
>
>
> > I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line
> > back as far as I can. I could care less about family
> > history or some odd relationship between two people of
> &g
I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line
back as far as I can. I could care less about family
history or some odd relationship between two people of
the same sex. So far, I have not found one homosexual
relationship in my family going back to 1800. Maybe
this is because my family
Darlene,
You are too narrow minded. I may not believe in that type of relationship,
but I am also educated enough to know that those relationships are as old as
marriage itself. Just because we don't come across written "confessions"
doesn't mean they didn't exist in our genealogies.
I think
I use Legacy because I want to trace my blood line
back as far as I can. I could care less about family
history or some odd relationship between two people of
the same sex. So far, I have not found one homosexual
relationship in my family going back to 1800. Maybe
this is because my family is
or Genealogy? - was Re: [LegacyUG]
Homosexual Entries
If Millenia wants to survive as a company, it must go the Family History
route. A Family History program can be used by everybody, including the
purists; a Genealogy program can only be used by the purists. They would be
foolish to limit
If Millenia wants to survive as a company, it must go the Family History
route. A Family History program can be used by everybody, including the
purists; a Genealogy program can only be used by the purists. They would be
foolish to limit their market any way.
___
Wa
21 matches
Mail list logo
