Darlene,
You don't make it clear what you are having trouble extracting. Sounds
to me like the zipped multimedia files? If that is the case do you
have a 3rd party compression program installed such as securezip,
filzip or 7-zip? Some of them add password protection.
Also your signature is a bit
Thanks for taking time to write, everyone. I guess I needed to "lurk" a
while before posting and I could have been more effective. Emily in
California
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-arch
My Windows 7 is waiting for Animap to catch up before converting to 64 bit. It
is not the only reason.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 8/10/10, Sherry/Support wrote:
> From: Sherry/Support
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AniMap on Windows 7
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 10,
I am running AniMap 3.0 on my Windows 7 64 bit laptop. No problems I'm aware
of.
Dave
David L. Johnson
"Happiness is a CHOICE"
-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:05 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subjec
If you'll go to the AniMap website at www.Goldbug.com, you'll read:
"AniMap is currently not compatible with 64-bit versions of Windows 7
or Vista. We are working diligently to resolve this issue and expect
to have a solution available by the end of August 2010. If you own
AniMap 3.0.2 we will upg
I'm sorry. As you have found, many of us leave unclear (to us) questions for
the impending re-ask. First which chart? Pedigree, or one created from the
Charting Program. If you want a person who has a photo attached, to not print
his/her spot on a report, then you have two choices (maybe more).
Emily,
I guess that you have not had much of a response, because you do not
actually say what you are trying to produce - so I will assume a report.
Basically Pictures attached to Sources or Vital Events will not be printed.
The only pictures to be selected are the first persons in the Picture
Ga
Thanks Dennis. I know it is going to be a lot of work no matter which
way I go.
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:49:19 -0500, Laura Johnson
> wrote:
>
>
>> When I entered the "Source Details", I entered them as follows:
>> "Film #2014483, Document #57" or "Film #1688171, Docume
Hi Emily,
> I sent a message to the list Sunday and now it is Tuesday and I have
> not heard anything. Am I on the list and just have no one interested
> in the question? That’s fine, just want to know if I am reaching the list.
>
I'm sending this reply to both the list and to Emily directly
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:49:19 -0500, Laura Johnson
wrote:
>When I entered the "Source Details", I entered them as follows:
>"Film #2014483, Document #57" or "Film #1688171, Document #446"
>This is fine EXCEPT that most of the films contain documents from many
>years (Film #2014483 contains the yea
Would someone running AniMap on Windows 7 please contact me offline as now
mine doesn't want to run stating things like "File B not present" and
"Comaps.exe has stopped working" (in other words, it crashes).
Thank you,
Lana
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Eti
Darlene & Don Hicks wrote:
> Hi, I have two computers and wanted to transport all my genealogy
> information from one to the other. Well, it worked for awhile, but
> when I tried to extract the latest update to tree, it tells me the
> files are private and I need a password. I have never privat
Hi, I have two computers and wanted to transport all my genealogy information
from one to the other. Well, it worked for awhile, but when I tried to extract
the latest update to tree, it tells me the files are private and I need a
password. I have never privatized any of my files and especially
I believe I saw this post but didn't know the answers so deleted it; I think
it did reach the group but it's entirely possible that I am confusing
another post; there are so many posts some days. Kathy
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Emily Rosenberg wrote:
> I sent a message to the list Sunda
Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
> I've watched this happen now for the past month or two. I seem to get
> ALL messages from the group EXCEPT for the original post by Ron
> Ferguson. Obviously others are getting his because they are replying
> to his message. Take for example the following
I've watched this happen now for the past month or two. I seem to get ALL
messages from the group EXCEPT for the original post by Ron Ferguson.
Obviously others are getting his because they are replying to his message.
Take for example the following.
> -Original Message---
I sent a message to the list Sunday and now it is Tuesday and I have not
heard anything. Am I on the list and just have no one interested in the
question? That's fine, just want to know if I am reaching the list. Thanks.
Emily in California
These were my questions, most answered by a call to L
I am not sure exactly how to ask this question so I am going to give as
much info as possible.
I have been researching one town in Sicily for about 35+ years. I have
been transcribing all of the LDS filmed documents for that town for over
12 years now and have been slowly entering them into Legac
Thank you Ron, that worked.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:15 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Marriage order in Chronology View
Charles,
The order of spouses is as that set
Charles Apple wrote:
> Multiple marriages of some people are listed out of order in the
> Chronology View. For Example someone's 1st wife may be listed as the
> 2nd wife and the 2nd wife as the 1st wife, etc. I have searched the
> help files, the Legacy Family Tree manual, and the Legacy Archives
>
Multiple marriages of some people are listed out of order in the Chronology
View. For Example someone's 1st wife may be listed as the 2nd wife and the
2nd wife as the 1st wife, etc. I have searched the help files, the Legacy
Family Tree manual, and the Legacy Archives for an solution to correcting
Tim,
I apologize for replying to the list. I had contacted Gold Bug and
thought you were responding from Gold Bug. I am not trying to start a
"fire-storm" (God knows that's easy enough to do on this list), and
sorry that I mis-interpreted the email source.
Larry
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:04 A
Thank you. Both methods work.
Scott
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 15:23, Scott Hall wrote:
>> Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
>> blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
>> "cause of death"
On 10/08/2010 15:23, Scott Hall wrote:
> Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
> blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
> "cause of death" field.
Just use "not equal to" and leave the "what" field blank.
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:23:55 -0400, Scott Hall
wrote:
>Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
>blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
>"cause of death" field. The * wildcard doesn't work, as it includes
>blanks. The ? wildcard doesn't w
Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
"cause of death" field. The * wildcard doesn't work, as it includes
blanks. The ? wildcard doesn't work either.
I thought l asked this before (and can't rememb
Larry,
It's unfortunate that you quoted my off list reply. I thought personal
email was personal. It makes me not want to help. Now, in your public
post, you make it sound like "I" am Gold Bug or "Work" for Gold Bug. I
am not affiliated with them at all, nor claim to be.
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
"P
We don't give support for the add-on programs or other software we
sell. We always refer the user to the original developer.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Larry McCumber wrote:
> Thanks for the replies and the help. I will go back to
Thanks for the replies and the help. I will go back to Gold Bug with
my questions. When I asked Gold Bug the same questions, I got this
reply from Tim Rosenlof and must have miss-interpreted what he meant.
"I could answer those questions, but they should probably come from
them personally. I happ
29 matches
Mail list logo
