I self-published a book and did not get an ISBN number. However, I did
register it with the Library of Congress.
Lisa Gorrell
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Paul Brodsky wrote:
> Unless you want to sell your book through a bookstore or other commercial
> outlet or get into libraries you dont n
Unless you want to sell your book through a bookstore or other commercial
outlet or get into libraries you dont need an ISBN
Visit isbn.org for more info.
However, you may wan to consider getting it copyright registered for just a
little extra protection. You dont need registration but its easy
Julia,
I have published thru lulu.com, and they assign the ISBN for the particular
book I am publishing. I do not have to get my own ISBN, although I can get
one and use it instead. Here's lulu.com's take on it:
http://connect.lulu.com/t5/ISBN-Distribution/What-is-an-ISBN-and-do-I-need-one/ta-p/3
*See if this answers your question. It -can- get complicated, depending on
what you want to do.
http://createbooks.com/faq_copyright_intellectual_property.html#isbn
**
Hope that helps.
**
Thank you.
**Robert*
*Genealogy without documentation is mythology! Always SOURCE your work.*
On Mon, Dec 5
Our family is thinking of putting a book together (of grandma's poems). Do we
need an ISBN for this type of book? It will just be distributed to our family
members at the reunion. Or rather everyone at the reunion will know where to go
to some print-on-demand printer to pay for and order their
A 'cleanup' of Surnames and Sources has resolved those two discrepancies.
On 6/12/2011 9:00:33 AM, J Richard Nickel (jrnic...@skymesh.com.au) wrote:
> Hmm, interesting. The number of individuals and the number of families
> are the same in both files. However, the number of unique surnames is
>
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:00:33 +1000, J Richard Nickel
wrote:
>Hmm, interesting. The number of individuals and the number of families
>are the same in both files. However, the number of unique surnames is
>(old/new) 547/406 (a HUGE discrepancy), and the number of Master Source
>entries is (old/ne
Hmm, interesting. The number of individuals and the number of families
are the same in both files. However, the number of unique surnames is
(old/new) 547/406 (a HUGE discrepancy), and the number of Master Source
entries is (old/new) 82/81.
I will do some more checking.
On 6/12/2011 7:52:59 AM
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:30:18 +1000, J Richard Nickel
wrote:
>Other than the File Management routines, is there any other testing I
>can perform to 'prove' the original fdb?
Do the number of individuals look OK? Maybe, after doing a backup on the
NEW .fdb, run a Legacy Check/Repair on it to see i
Using Access 2002.
As mentioned in other replies, exporting the fdb to a new file appears
to have fixed the MS Access problem, but now I'm concerned about the
integrity of the original fdb.
Other than the File Management routines, is there any other testing I
can perform to 'prove' the original f
Nanette, call them. I called a few mos ago because I had trouble signing on
and got on as an indexer - with help.
Betty
FL
From: Nannette Fretwell
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] V8
I've tr
I've tried several times to get allowance on the site - even as an indexer
and arbitrator I still cannot get through the login. It's a bit frustrating.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Cheryl Rothwell wrote:
> Has something different happened? I went to the site, signed in,
> everything seemed th
What version of MS Access are you using? You need to have MS Access 2000
or later.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation
br...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
We are changing the world of genealogy!
When replying to this message, please include all previous corresponde
On 6/12/2011 6:28 AM, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:16:43 +1000, J Richard Nickel
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, Legacy appears to be working perfectly.
>
> The only thing I can think of trying is to use Legacy to export your
> data to a NEW Legacy database. Then try opening that one in
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:16:43 +1000, J Richard Nickel
wrote:
>Yes, Legacy appears to be working perfectly.
The only thing I can think of trying is to use Legacy to export your
data to a NEW Legacy database. Then try opening that one in Access.
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
http
Yes, Legacy appears to be working perfectly.
On 5/12/2011 10:38 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:57:39 +1000, J Richard Nickel
> wrote:
>
>> I receive the following error message when trying to open an .fdb file
>> with MS Access:
>>
>> "This database is in an unexpected s
Has something different happened? I went to the site, signed in,
everything seemed the same as before.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Paula Ryburn wrote:
>
> Typed too soon... have my login but here's the message when I try to use it:
>
> Your account is not ready for new.familysearch.org.
> Me
Typed too soon... have my login but here's the message when I try to use it:
Your account is not ready for new.familysearch.org.
Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.You will be informed
by your priesthood leaders when your area can use the system. Members should use
their L
I just did this and received mine already!
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field
Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle
Jone
On 05/12/2011 18:24, Sherry/Support wrote:
> That's a completely different log-in than the one for new.FamilySearch.org
>
> You have to go to new.FamilySearch.org and register for a password to that
> site.
Under "Do I need to register?" the site says "No. You do not need to
register if you alrea
It took a *long* time for the site to be rolled out to the church
members. I'm sure they're trying to not get it overwhelmed and crash.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:18 AM, David C Abernathy
wrote:
> Yes, Been waiting since March of 2011. an
That's a completely different log-in than the one for new.FamilySearch.org
You have to go to new.FamilySearch.org and register for a password to that site.
That doesn't mean you'll get to log in right away... it could take
awhile for you to get the log-in for NFS.
Check the website for more deta
Yes, Been waiting since March of 2011. and is way to long to wait.
Still, not access, I even contacted, FamilySearch, and they just keep telling
me to wait in line and my number may come up. I am not holding my breath.
Thanks,
David C Abernathy
Email disclaimers
--
I'm already registered for familysearch.org and when I try to login using
that id/password I still get the message that says my account is not ready
for new.familysearch.org. Are people gaining access by just creating a new
account with a different id and password?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:57 AM
It is available. Just go to new.FamilySearch.org and register to get
your log-in.
Some people reported that they got their log-in right away, others are
still waiting so it appears they're still issuing them in a roll-out
manner.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon,
While we are at it, let's wish for the LDS to open up NFS to the general
public. :)
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Mike Fry wrote:
> On 2011/12/05 18:24, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
>
> > My early Christmas present would be V8 ;-)
> >
>
> You obviously still believe that there's a Santa Claus :-)
>
>
What year?Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 12/5/11, Mike Fry wrote:
From: Mike Fry
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] V8
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Monday, December 5, 2011, 8:55 AM
On 2011/12/05 18:24, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
> My early Christmas present would be V8 ;-)
>
You obviously still belie
On 2011/12/05 18:24, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
> My early Christmas present would be V8 ;-)
>
You obviously still believe that there's a Santa Claus :-)
--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
"Include Reference Number" in "Box Items"
Tim Rosenlof
On 12/5/2011 9:43 AM, Sherry/Support wrote:
> It's not an option at this time. You might want to submit a suggestion form.
>
> Sincerely,
> Sherry
> Technical Support
> Legacy Family Tree
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Tim Rosenlof
It's not an option at this time. You might want to submit a suggestion form.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to include RIN on the chart ?
>
> --
> Tim Rosenlof
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guideli
Nevermind ! Found it.
Tim Rosenlof
On 12/5/2011 9:36 AM, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to include RIN on the chart ?
>
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@le
Can anyone tell me how to include RIN on the chart ?
--
Tim Rosenlof
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov
My early Christmas present would be V8 ;-)
--
Tim Rosenlof
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:57:39 +1000, J Richard Nickel
wrote:
>I receive the following error message when trying to open an .fdb file
>with MS Access:
>
>"This database is in an unexpected state; Microsoft Access cant open it.
>
So does Legacy still work with this database?
--
Dennis Kowallek (
I receive the following error message when trying to open an .fdb file
with MS Access:
"This database is in an unexpected state; Microsoft Access can’t open it.
The database has been converted from a prior version of Microsoft Access
by using the DAO CompactDatabase method instead of the Convert
35 matches
Mail list logo
