Dan,
Repeating previous user comments. Put everything you want to save in one
file. Two files lead to a lot more work and confusion. I know, I tried it.
Legacy has many options for selecting just the ancestors or descendants
of a specific person. One of the most useful options is creating a
"book
I have folders in my Thunderbird program, too, where I read most of the
emails sent to my Gmail account (and I'm composing this reply).
What I described below is talking about Gmail directly on the web, ie at
gmail.com or mail.google.com in a browser, not being read via a program
where the mail is
Personally, I have two email addresses --one for genealogy-related emails
-- pphgen@ and another with a different address. Makes life simpler.
Pat
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Jennie Matheson
wrote:
> I have managed to get "folders" into my Gmail.
>
> I manage my emails using Mozilla Thu
A non-plain answer would be a work-around like this: Merge the two
files. You could separate them again if you really want to, but I think
it's probably not necessary. If you want to share only part of the file
with particular family members, you can use the tagging options to
export only that p
You could create a source called "Memorabilia" and use "in
my possession" for the depository, and a description as a
detail where appropriate. At least that way, it would all
be in one place and not scattered around with one entry in
Useless Stock Certificate, one in Church Bulletin, one in
Childr
Best bet is to use one file for both families. No sync required
Sent from my iPhone
Leon Chapman
chap...@gmail.com
623-398-8900
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 7:18 PM, "David Abernathy"
> wrote:
>
> The plain answer is NO.
> Why not just use one combined file?
>
> Thanks,
> David C Abernathy
> Email dis
Does the Artifact SourceWriter Template work for this?
If not use another which includes the option: Privately held
So long as the certificate is clearly defined and it is clear that you
actually have it, then you've described the source.
Don't get hung up on templates thinking you must have info
David is right. One file. Then it is simple to split when necessary. You
will avoid making entries multiple times, correcting locations, standardizing
spellings, etc.
Ron Taylor
On Monday, June 16, 2014 6:20 PM, David Abernathy
wrote:
The plain answer is NO.
Why not just use one combine
The plain answer is NO.
Why not just use one combined file?
Thanks,
David C Abernathy
Email disclaimers
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head.
-
Hi All;
I'm new to Legacy and have a question.
I'm compiling two family files using Legacy8, one for my family and one for my
wife's family. My question is how to "sync" the entries for myself, my wife and
our children in both files. Is there a way to avoid entering the data twice?
Thanks for yo
I have managed to get "folders" into my Gmail.
I manage my emails using Mozilla Thunderbird and the folders that are
created there using filters are reflected in my online Gmail account and
thus allow my emails to also synch between my desktop and my laptop.
If anyone wishes assistance with this
I have several old family stock certificates that I would like to list as
sources. These are old companies that are out of business, so the only
value is in the artwork and history of the owners.
I have labored over this information and others using Legacy and Mill's
Evidence Explained. I canno
THanks. I cancelled the process when it was creeping in the 950,000 range
and changed the limit to 10. It's done now and gave me exactly what I
needed.
Kathy
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:48 PM, CE WOOD wrote:
> I go back more than 30 generations and have the Blood limit set
> to 5. Maybe setti
Yvonne Morehouse
> On Jun 13, 2014, at 9:32 PM, Cathy Pinner wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
> That's a great idea. However, the only way you are going to get it at
> present is to use a Descendant Chart Report, save to Text and edit.
>
> Use the Format option to Pack information on one line and include
> M
I go back more than 30 generations and have the Blood limit set to 5. Maybe
setting it to 999 means comparing each of your individuals than many times. You
may not live so long.
CE
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:46:37 -0600
Subject: [LegacyUG] Setting Relationships
From: kmeyer2...@gmail.com
To: leg
I have a separate database of my father in law's 50 years of research
containing over 100,000 individuals.
I'm trying to get the program to show the relationships of the direct line
so that I'm able to compare these to some Ancestry.com DNA matches.
I set the parameters so that non-blood relation
Hello,
Can anyone tell me how to import nicknames from RootsMagic Version 6 to
Legacy Version 7.5?
I generated at GedCom from RootsMagic and imported but there is nothing
showing any of the nicknames I had entered in that field in RootsMagic.
Is there a work around to get those nicknames imported
Cathy, you may be struggling, but you have the answers. I changed the setting
and now all of the events print.
Thanks for your help.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Cathy Pinner [mailto:genea...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 9:45 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re:
Hi Ed,
I'm struggling.
Have you checked the Sentence Definitions for the Events that aren't printing?
In Report Options - Format Tab - you could try changing to List style to see if
they're printing then. If so, that would confirm that there's something wrong
with the Sentence Definitions.
Cath
Cathy, your first reading was correct. However, I have checked everything you
mentioned and still (@ half) of the events do not print. Is there something
that I should/should not be doing in the body of the events screen? I've tried
to compare the events to be sure the info is similar, but to
20 matches
Mail list logo
