Being a little cheeky here. There has been a 'last' update to 7.5 (build 286).
Only item in it disables the non-working integration with FamilySearch. Since
7.5 no longer does what it originally said it would do on the tin, can I have a
refund please? :-) :-)
--
Regards,
Mike Fry (Jhb)
Legacy
Only if you bought it within the past 30 days g
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:50 AM, MikeFry emjay...@gmail.com wrote:
Being a little cheeky here. There has been a 'last' update to 7.5 (build
286).
Only item in it disables the non-working
I should have wrote - only if you bought it within the last 30 days
directly from us g
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Sherry/Support she...@legacyfamilytree.com
wrote:
Only if you bought it within the past 30 days g
Sincerely,
Mike,
I know you're not serious but for those who continue to ask about 7.5 it is
peculiar that they don't understand the issue. Version 7.5 would still
function with Family Search if Family Search still responded to their old APIs.
It's like a person with a transistor radio claiming the
I thought the update from 7 to 7.5 (FamilySearch integration) was a free
update, wouldn't that make the refund 0 US Dollar? g
Evert
2014-09-15 14:26 GMT+02:00 Sherry/Support she...@legacyfamilytree.com:
I should have wrote - only if you bought it within the last 30 days
directly from us g
I have 7.5 and 8.0. Because of issues some months ago with 8 I decided my
working copy would be 7.5. I monitor news on 8 and because of family search
connection I use 8 to look there. I just decided to run the repair tool on
my data base on 8 and find 5 errors. All of them give a RIN number and
I have just run Check/Repair on a family file and this error has been flagged
up:-
==
There were Duplicate Source Citations found (Duplicates have been removed):
There were just the five messages (all the same except for the RIN) for the
5 different RINS. I imagine that the data would relate to each particular
RIN but that's all I saw.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:20 AM, MikeFry emjay...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just run Check/Repair on a family file and
Well, it's not actually the Sources which have shifted, but the names of
Collections change and/or Search methods change and I'm wondering how
other LUGgers handle this.
Here's an example which illustrates exactly what I mean. In the Good
Old Days when searching FindMyPast for a marriage in the
I never really understood all the panels in 7.5 when the Search was
available but I do have 2 sets of RED arrows on two people on one family
line. I know I saw lots of data a few months ago when 7.5 had the link to
FS. Looking at the 8.0 data the red links also appear for the same
individuals but
Jenny,
Online sources change format quite often, therefore, I do not update all of my
old citations. The reason for this is that by doing so, I would be spending all
of my available time updating old source citations instead of researching my
ancestors. However, I would set up a new Master
Jenny,
This is why when I input a website into a source citation I always use the
address of the main page. For example, when I download images from a records
collection from FamilySearch.org such as the Georgia Death Certificates
1914-1927 found here
I found it on Family Search isn't what I'd call pinpoint
accuracy or reliability as a source. It's right up there
with It was on-line somewhere.
IMO.
Cheryl
Michele/Support wrote:
Jenny,
This is why when I input a website into a source citation I always use the
address of the main page.
Cheryl,
Here is an actual example from my personal file to give you a better idea.
This gives the main page for GenealogyBank as the web address in the source
citation and not a link to the specific page within GenealogyBank.
Ernest Lee Lewis dies at Martinez, The Augusta Chronicle, 22
Hi Steve,
Do any of these people actually have ANY marriages? In either copy of
your database? There is not enough information here for us to tell.
Wendy
Steve Pick said the following on 16/09/2014 03:59:
I have 7.5 and 8.0. Because of issues some months ago with 8 I decided
my working copy
While I agree with your assessment that an “average genealogist” would be able
to find the actual detailed page with nothing more than a link to the main web
page, I would also submit that an average genealogist would be able to navigate
through the structure to find the detailed page when
Michelle,
I'm not the source-police this year, ITGF! So, whatever
works for you.
Thing is, though, one wouldn't cite Library of Congress if
one had seen the item in their Newspaper Periodical
Reading Room; one would cite the newspaper itself -- '/The
Augusta Chronicle/, Vol. dxx, No. 213, pg
There is no perfect solution to this dilemma.
1) I can put an exact URL that is 214 characters long and it might be gone
tomorrow
2) I can put the URL to the main page which is certainly shorter and will
most likely last longer but could also disappear
3) I could use a Tiny
Or the Internet might disappear in the future as well….ya never know. Once
SkyNet becomes self-aware, the machines will attack. J
From: Michele/Support [mailto:mich...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:29 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG]
No marriages of any of them. From memory now, I think at least two died in
childhood.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Wendy Howard wendy.how...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Steve,
Do any of these people actually have ANY marriages? In either copy of
your database? There is not enough information
Jenny,
I think you've hit one of the problems of how much to lump and how much
to split.
If you haven't lumped so much, you can just edit the Master Source.
When viewing Parish Register Images, I make the Church my Master Source.
Perhaps that's too split for some people, but I'd never go beyond
Divorce
I have a couple who married and later divorced I have no events of
notes for the couple except to have put Divorced in the status box
on the marriage
The printout reads
The marriage ended in divorce Divorced
If I take out the Divorced from the status in
Janet:
It would help if you could tell us which report and which version of Legacy
you are using.
___
Leon Chapman
chap...@gmail.com
-
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Janet Miller janetmil...@slingshot.co.nz
wrote:
Divorce
I have a couple who married and later divorced I have no events
23 matches
Mail list logo
