never work for sharing info, you
are right about that. Jerry
Sent from my android device.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lang
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:35 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
Howard,
I usually never
gacy will balk when it catches a name field with a ? in it. This is
in the standardisation tips.
Kind Regards
Mark Lang
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Cady [mailto:howardc...@q.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 18 March 2012 9:52 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subj
bc use bp+33 where bp=b. of parent in previous generation
6. Use d.-65
8. Use dp-32 where dp=d. of parent
9. Use mc-53 where mc=m. of child
10. Use 33 years per generation from any known date.
Howard Cady
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry"
To:
Sent: S
-
http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com
== All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus ==
-Original Message-
From: Jerry [mailto:jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired su
[LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
Hi David. I like your use of the ? and I do something very similar.
But would you mind giving me a couple examples of what you place in the LAST
NAME field and what you place in the FIRST NAME FIELD, so I'm sure
of what you are doing? Than
--
> http://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com
> == All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus ==
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2
trees in LDS or Ancestry, which I
> can't test.
>
> kb
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David C Abernathy"
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:12:26 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquire
ubject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
kb,
For your phantom people you could mark them as private and then when you
export to a gedcom they won't transfer unless you include private data in
the export.
Russ
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.Legac
in LDS or Ancestry, which I
can't test.
kb
- Original Message -
From: "David C Abernathy"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:12:26 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
I use what info I have about the couple, i
Group@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this. My main concern is
unanticipated side effects. Placeholders like Mr. or Firstwife work well for
the original compiler, who has Legacy and external files, but
Original Message-
From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:47 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this. My main concern
Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this. My main concern is
unanticipated side effects. Placeholders like Mr. or Firstwife work well for
the original compiler, who has Legacy and external files, but wider
distribution and less capable software must be anticipated. Legacy too might
Hmm! And I thought I had problematic families! Sorry, can't offer any advice
though.
Cheers
Jan
-Original Message-
From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2012 02:09
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Persons with
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:09 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames
>
> One of my lines has a Richard Pratt with a s
explained in the notes.
I think this is the best you can do for now.
Michele
-Original Message-
From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:09 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired
One of my lines has a Richard Pratt with a spouse Richord, per IGI and other
sources. Her PCC Will gives the true tale. She describes herself as "Richard
Pratt, widow", and her daughters by surname, e.g. "my daughter Osmond". A
collateral Pratt line was then nationally famous, Lords Chief Jus
16 matches
Mail list logo
