...@tiscali.co.uk
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, August 15, 2012 4:31:53 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Brian,
I have resolved similar issues by finding the descendants of All 3 brothers.
You may find a namesake of your 6x GGfather with the other families thus
Charani, You make me chuckle. Rest assured you are not the only person who uses
Legacy in this fashion. ;)
--Paula in Texas
snip
(Smelling salts at the ready for anyone getting an attack of the
vapours at the way I use Legacy G)
--
Charani (UK)
OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick,
Greinton
August 2012 02:23
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
I find this thread very interesting and informative, thanks to Kb and Ian for
their comments I am in a similar situation of my 6x Great Grandfather being the
probable son of 1 of 3 brothers, I
options, and
such a relationship can never be set in stone.
Ron Ferguson,
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Alan Pereira
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:31 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Brian,
I have resolved similar issues by finding
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
3rd time lucky!!
Alan,
I can see where you are coming from, but I have not found the need to do
extensive work on this, with respect to pretty well all my family, who are
readily identifiable from the sources available. There is one exception
be an error. After all it cannot be wrong because
everybody has the same details. Huh!
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Alan Pereira
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:35 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Thanks Charani
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 4:35:40 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Thanks Charani Ron
I think I will just use the research notes when I need to clarify proof.
Ron, I will adopt your probability approach when I have negative proofs as I
agree entirely
.
Ian GARDENER
Australia
www.gardener.org.au
From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2012 4:37 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Alan,
I also just document reasoning in research notes
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Alan,
Your last sentence is one one that everyone should really note, and illustrates
one of the dangers of taking trees from user sites on the web.
In many cases it will be found that they can be traced back to a single tree
from which one
]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 August 2012 8:55 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Hi kb,
Thanks for the tip on Bayesian probability. I must confess that the math is way
beyond me these days (maybe alwaysJ) but the underlying broad principle is
definitely
I am starting a research task in the todo list in providing proof(s) of
relationship, which can be through a multitude of sources, the most
difficult being the negative proof.
My initial throughts were to create a document as a backup source detailing
these proofs. Then again, why not just use
Alan Pereira wrote:
I am starting a research task in the todo list in providing proof(s) of
relationship, which can be through a multitude of sources, the most
difficult being the negative proof.
My initial throughts were to create a document as a backup source detailing
these proofs. Then
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Proof of relationship
Alan,
I sent this earlier, before Charani replied, actually I sent it from an
email address not registered at Legacy so it bounced! Anyhow, I decided to
send it as my reply is not quite the same.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk
13 matches
Mail list logo
