Yes thank you Jenny. That is exactly what I meant. :)
Sent from Outlook
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 8:04 AM -0700, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
wrote:
On 24/05/2015 15:04, lio . wrote:
The is only one issue stopping me from embracing Shared Events (unless
it was changed this past
On 24/05/2015 15:04, lio . wrote:
The is only one issue stopping me from embracing Shared Events (unless
it was changed this past year).
Example: I source a birth with two sources, source A and source B.
All great.
Then I source a Shared Event with birth source C and share the event.
All
The is only one issue stopping me from embracing Shared Events (unless it was
changed this past year).
Example: I source a birth with two sources, source A and source B. All
great.
Then I source a Shared Event with birth source C and share the event. All
great.
But... Anyone I shared source C
Thanks Sherry
I have already decided to never add only a name, I always put the person in
the master list.
Cause: sooner or later the name will show up as a real person, and then I
will get a warning that he/she already exist
2015-05-23 19:32 GMT+02:00 Sherry/Support she...@legacyfamilytree.com:
I mean the possibility you get when you want to share an event with one or
more people:
1) Select from the name list
2) Just enter the name of a person.
In option 1 you get the name list of all existing people (master list I
call it)
In option 2 you get a menu where you can write whatever e.g.
FamilySearch doesn't support shared events at this time. You'll also
need to put in a request to them!
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:48 AM, pcord...@gmail.com pcord...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for all the replies. I think I will put this
Thank you for all the replies. I think I will put this in as a suggestion
to Legacy.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:39 PM, pcord...@gmail.com pcord...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I love shared events because it's such a timesaver in Legacy.
However, none of these shared events can be shared with Family
This is something that's on our suggestion list.
However, it would probably work if the shared events are linked to
individuals in the Family File, not if you just add a name without it
being in the file itself.
That's why for now I'm only using the Event Clipboard. Plus, with the
Event
do not think FamilySearch will change the GEDCOM standard, at least until
version 6 (if it comes).
My idea was that -when exporting to GEDCOM- Legacy should split the shared
events between connected persons and make them to real events with a
previous question in the export menu and perhaps with
By entering in the Master List do you mean as a name. I'm not certain exactly
what you mean. Then the people show up as unrelated? I have several people I'm
pretty sure are related but don't know for certain or how. I think this might
work well for me just never thought of it and want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
