Gary,
I don't think that the point is can it be done, but rather, should it
be done. In my view it shouldn't; my reasoning being that if one has
decided to keep the families separate then that is how they should be,
and that is how they should be presented.
It is possible to have both worlds, as
Gary,
There is a typo in my last post. The phrase I would not wish to put my
consideration about that of
the family at that time should say *above* that of the family
Sorry about that!
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins
Gary Elder wrote:
Is there a setting in which the combination of children and
step-children are sorted by birth date?
Currently, Legacy shows step-children at the bottom of the children
listings, even though their birth date precedes those of the other
children of the current spouse. Doing a
Ron, thanks for your reply. I did see the earlier post about linking
children to both sets of parents.
I'm sure there is some underlying reason why linking to both sets of
parents is necessary, but it seems to me Legacy be able to list all
children in the appropriate birth order without having
4 matches
Mail list logo
