While not freaking out, I would discourage this method. I have inherited
data via Gedcom that expands source details in the Notes. I find the reports
and web pages that result appear very bloated and verbose, often with
redundant information. Who wants to read all that when trying to scan and
under
On 01/03/2015 15:56, Ward Walker wrote:
> While not freaking out, I would discourage this method. I have inherited
> data via Gedcom that expands source details in the Notes. I find the reports
> and web pages that result appear very bloated and verbose, often with
> redundant information. Who want
I am another who uses notes rather than sources. For me, Legacy is primarily a
research aid, secondarily a family history collection/archive, lastly and only
occasionally, a formal genealogy.
In reverse order, formal sourcing took a hit years back when a particular style
was promoted, then a se
3 matches
Mail list logo
