took a while but they pulled
the whole thing. The moral of the story: sharing beware !
Derk
- Original Message -
From: "Russ McGillivray"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:00:32 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
K
got no reply.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Kirsten Bowman [mailto:vik...@rvi.net]
Sent: April-09-12 8:17 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
Jenny:
To post sources or not is certainly your own choice. For those on the fence
Graham, A subject including "Q dates" would've been nice here. Just sayin'.
Thanks.
--Paula
From: Graham Love
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sun, April 8, 2012 12:17:07 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySear
available and I'm grateful.
Sorry for going "off topic," but without having the benefit of Legacy software
everything would be lost!
>
> From: Jenny M Benson
>To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 6:20 PM
&g
ut publishing a book then
I think including sources is a great option.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: Jenny M Benson
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 3:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
On 09/04/2012 22:36, Marcy Cole wrote:
On 09/04/2012 22:36, Marcy Cole wrote:
> Not quite sure why you feel publishing your sources is "handing everything
> on a plate".
Because if I do so someone can look at my record and copy the entire
record, including Source, to their own database without contacting me,
without crediting me and wi
nt: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
Not quite sure why you feel publishing your sources is "handing everything
on a plate". If the IGI had required sources from the beginning, we would
all be much
uot;Jenny M Benson"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
On 08/04/2012 12:00, Graham Love wrote:
> After waiting for what seemed like years I was lucky enough to get LDS
> access and use the 'new' Legacy
: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
You can add sources to any piece of information that you add in NFS any time;
it's been like that from the beginning. It just doesn't 'auto source' when you
important a gedcom or when you add records via LFS. The two systems just don&#x
roup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
>
> I was able to add new data (my 2X ggmother) AND sourcing
>
>
>
>
> Eliz
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Mike Fry wrote:
>> On 2012/04/08 13:00, Graham Love wrote:
>>>
On 09/04/2012 10:42, Alan Pereira wrote:
> Graham, if you show the quarter in the format "from Jan to Mar 1856"
> then it will transfer as Mar 1856, which apart from manually entering
> the details, seems the best nFS can offer.
This problem is irking me too, and the only workaround I have found i
Eliz, How did you manage to add sourcing?
Alan Pereira
-Original Message-
From: Eliz Hanebury [mailto:elizhg...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 April 2012 22:21
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
I was able to add new data (my 2X ggmother
he From to format.
Alan Pereira
-Original Message-
From: Graham Love [mailto:love-fam...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 08 April 2012 18:17
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch 2?
Thanks to all those who have given their views to my first po
first, to aim
towards the second.
From: Graham Love
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 4:00 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
After waiting for what seemed like years I was lucky enough to get LDS
access and use
I was able to add new data (my 2X ggmother) AND sourcing
Eliz
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Mike Fry wrote:
> On 2012/04/08 13:00, Graham Love wrote:
>> After waiting for what seemed like years I was lucky enough to get LDS
>> access and use the 'new' Legacy FamilySearch feature. After matc
Thanks to all those who have given their views to my first post on this
subject. Generally it seems they don't differ greatly from my own experience
and I guess we all need to give it time! I must admit I don't mind leaving a
correct legacy of my own family based on quite a few decades of research
e first place :-).
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: Graham Love
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 4:00 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
After waiting for what seemed like years I was lucky enough to get LDS
access and use the '
I am trying to take a more positive view. Despite the obvious data inaccuracies
and duplication in the current database, the fact remains that nFS's basic
design is a single record per person. This should, over time, improve data
accuracy by putting all facts, correct and incorrect, sourced and
7:01 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] What is the point of FamilySearch?
After waiting for what seemed like years I was lucky enough to get LDS access
and use the 'new' Legacy FamilySearch feature. After matching several hundred
deceased relatives without a single new piece of
19 matches
Mail list logo
