2011/6/9 Bruce Jones :
>> Would it help if a warning appears telling the user that more than one
>> source is on the clipboard and do yo want to continue, Yes or No?
A warning that could be turned off by the user...
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/index.htm
http://gr
> I absolutely agree. There are lots of ways to screw up your database,
>> >>> and I've found a number of them, but don't dumb down the product.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Original Message-
>> >>> From: Dennis M
[mailto:juicebo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
Would it help if a warning appears telling the user that more than one source
is on the clipboard and do yo want to continue, Yes or No?
On Thu, Jun
Excellent idea, Bruce
From: Bruce Jones
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
Would it help if a warning appears telling the user that more than one source
is on the clipboard and do yo want to continue, Yes or No
There are lots of ways to screw up your database,
>> >>> and I've found a number of them, but don't dumb down the product.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Original Message-
>> >>> From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...
gt;>> I absolutely agree. There are lots of ways to screw up your database,
> and I've found a number of them, but don't dumb down the product.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:ko
solutely agree. There are lots of ways to screw up your database, and
>>> I've found a number of them, but don't dumb down the product.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-
>>> From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com]
>>
Sorry for the wrong attribution on the previous email.
>If the programmers leave it alone it's ok for me ; ) (the feature
>isn't part of legacy anymore).
It is part of my copy of Legacy ... because I refused to upgrade! It was
too useful to give up.
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoft
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:21:51 -0400, Bob Vary
wrote:
>If the programmers leave it alone it's ok for me ; ) (the feature
>isn't part of legacy anymore).
It is part of my copy of Legacy ... because I refused to upgrade! It was
too useful to give up.
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftwa
rking well for them. It
seems to me that instead of greasing the squeaky wheel you decided to remove it.
-Original Message-
From: Evert van Dijken [mailto:evandij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:57 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending so
Ditto. I miss this feature.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Bob Vary
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 7:26 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] appending sources
I absolutely agree. There are lots of ways to screw up your database, and
I've found a number of
oduct.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:17 AM
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Jun 20
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:26:51 -0400, Bob Vary
wrote:
>There are lots of ways to screw up your database, and I've found a number of
>them
I've accidentally pasted wrong citations into my database when I only
had one citation in the clipboard! (I forgot to copy the citation I
wanted into the clipb
#x27;t dumb down the product.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:17 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:31:40 +02
yUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:31:40 +0200, Evert van Dijken
wrote:
>And to add it an option doesn't seem ok to me, because users will use
>that option and a lot of family files will get corrupted again.
Leave it for the users to decide.
--
De
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:31:40 +0200, Evert van Dijken
wrote:
>And to add it an option doesn't seem ok to me, because users will use
>that option and a lot of family files will get corrupted again.
Leave it for the users to decide.
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/inde
I tend to agree with Evert.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Evert van Dijken wrote:
> A lot of family files got corrupted because of that feature (sources
> added to the wrong events and the wrong individuals because users
> didn't realise there were 2 or more sources added to the source
> clipbo
A lot of family files got corrupted because of that feature (sources
added to the wrong events and the wrong individuals because users
didn't realise there were 2 or more sources added to the source
clipboard).
And to add it an option doesn't seem ok to me, because users will use
that option and a
I am so glad I am not the only person that misses this feature!
michele
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before No
menu.
5-104
Russ Strong
From: Kathy Meyer
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:44 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
I wish I could see this function in person. I am so totally lost as to how that
would work and why it would save so much time. I also
function be put back in? Since they obviously already have the code, it
> should be fairly easy to re-implement.
>
>
>
> *From:* CE WOOD [mailto:wood...@msn.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 08, 2011 1:09 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] a
>Really, how many times do we cite three sources
>on multiple people?
I don't use it for that. I use it when I am cleaning up citations. For
example, if I have 3 citations attached to a General Note, and I later
create an Event/Fact to replace the General Note, I can easily copy all
3 citations in
t; couldn't hack it. A real loss for the program.
>
> CE
>
> - Original Message -
> From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
> I just wonder why
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
That's too bad. I would say that I have 'grown into' many Legacy features and
I wouldn't have used that feature in the beginning but I can certainly see the
usefulness of it now. I suppose if it were so complicated as to tak
, 2011 12:47 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
That's too bad. I would say that I have 'grown into' many Legacy features and
I wouldn't have used that feature in the beginning but I can certainly see the
usefulness of it now. I s
Yes.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Pereira<mailto:alanpere...@tiscali.co.uk>
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] appending sources
Thanks for keeping me in
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
That's too bad. I would say that I have 'grown into' many Legacy features
and I wouldn't have used that feature in the beginning but I can certainly see
the usefulness of it now. I suppose if it were so complicated as to take more
time
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
The only reason given was that it was just too complicated for some folks. All
of us who liked it didn't comment, and they listened to the folks who couldn't
hack it. A real loss for the program.
CE
- Original Message -
oup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:09 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
>
> I just wonder why they took the capability to do away [image: Sad smile]
>
> michele
>
>
> *From:* BG Johnson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10
to:cranberryf...@cobridge.tv>
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
I just wonder why they took the capability to do away
michele
From: BG Johnson<mailto:b...@brme
>This can still be done. You can load up to ten sources on the source
>clipboard. See the help file for source clipboard for detailed instructions.
>I also suggest you view the webinars Geoff gave in the past couple of weeks on
>entering a death certificate and a marriage record. The training tu
[mailto:cranberryf...@cobridge.tv]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:02 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] appending sources
You can SAVE 10 different clipboards, this I know. But can you ASSIGN more
than once source at the same time with one click?
michele
Legacy User Group
. The training tutorials are
also great in explaining this.
bgj
From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv [mailto:cranberryf...@cobridge.tv]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] appending sources
Many versions ago, you would append the clipboard
I can’t type today! I should be you COULD append the clipboard and you COULD
copy and paste
From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] appending sources
Many versions ago, you would append the clipboard. You
Many versions ago, you would append the clipboard. You should copy and paste
more than one source at a time. Then it was taken away. I asked about this a
long time ago and was told that we would be getting it back? Whatever happened
with that?
For example, let’s say I am using the 1850, 186
35 matches
Mail list logo
