This is great! What an innovative use of that option. I like it, thanks.
Sally
On 2/24/2010 10:19 AM, Rick Bowden wrote:
> Sally,
> If you want a visual cue in your database in the form of colour you
> might consider using the uncertain gender option. In the Individual
> information wind
Thanks for another good idea!
Sally
On 2/23/2010 9:31 AM, leo macdonald wrote:
> I have a suggestion, attach the questionable children to the family that they
> grew up living with, using the family surname if that is what they used. They
> may have been adopted, a grandchild raised as their own
Sally,
If you want a visual cue in your database in the form of colour you
might consider using the uncertain gender option. In the Individual
information window , next to the Title suffix box there are three radio
buttons , M , F and ?. Even if you know the gender of the individual you
could
Sally,
If you want a visual cue in your database in the form of colour you
might consider using the uncertain gender option. In the Individual
information window , next to the Title suffix box there are three radio
buttons , M , F and ?. Even if you know the gender of the individual you
could
Jenny M Benson wrote:
> Ron Ferguson wrote
>> I use the Individual ToDo so that the Icon on the Family screen is
>> 'lit up' and clearly visible (click the grey clipped note).
>
> Do you know, I never even noticed that was there! How brilliant!
>
> Thanks, Ron.
LOL
Ron Ferguson
_
Ron Ferguson wrote
>I use the Individual ToDo so that the Icon on the Family screen is 'lit
>up' and clearly visible (click the grey clipped note).
Do you know, I never even noticed that was there! How brilliant!
Thanks, Ron.
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.Lega
That's a good idea to do in addition to using "challenged". I love back
up plans.
Sally
On 2/23/2010 3:22 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
> Terri,
>
> Without disagreeing with your use of "Challenged" and "Disproved" the
> problem with their use is that they are are not visible other than in
> reports (i
Found it, thanks.
Since asking the question the other researcher got back to me & admitted
that he had no idea why he put that child there or where he got the name
from.
But, I've learned a lot in the asking.
Thanks again,
Sally
On 2/22/2010 11:21 PM, Terri Brown wrote:
> Correction - The Chal
o think about that
> and try it out. Do you use simply a general ToDo or do you attach a
> ToDo to the parents?
>
> Terri
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Ron Ferguson
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Sent: Tue, February 23, 2010 3:22:29 AM
> Subje
- Original Message
From: Ron Ferguson
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, February 23, 2010 3:22:29 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable children
Terri,
Without disagreeing with your use of "Challenged" and "Disproved" the
problem with their use is that they are are no
s Ron stated list it in the ToDo list.
Leo
> From: ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable children
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:22:29 +
>
> Terri,
>
> Without disagreeing with your use of "Challenged&q
s under Relationship to Father
> and Relationship to Mother. There is also a Disproved status.
>
> Terri Brown
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Heeren
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 5:37:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Legacy
Correction - The Challenged status is under Relationship to Father and
Relationship to Mother. There is also a Disproved status.
Terri Brown
- Original Message
From: Heeren
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Mon, February 22, 2010 5:37:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
Heeren wrote:
>>
> Sally
>> Sorry about the strange fonts... new mail program& we're having
>> trouble bonding...
>>
>
It's hell when one has trouble bonding :-)
Ron Ferguson
Create your Website with Legacy, see Tutorials at:
http://www.fergy
That's a good idea, too.
Challenged isn't one of the status options but, as you said, it can be
added. Now, if we could assign a color to these children at the same
time
Thank you for sharing your solution.
Sally
On 2/22/2010 3:59 PM, Terri Brown wrote:
> When I have a situation like this
On 2/22/2010 3:32 PM, Ron Ferguson wrote:
>
> *Caution* Another Researcher. This is, of course, a secondary source and by
> itself very unreliable. If this researcher quotes sources it is essential
> they are followed up, if not, then extreme caution is advised.
>
Always... but sometimes these l
I probably don't use my tags enough, thanks for the idea.
Sally
On 2/22/2010 3:22 PM, Tim Rosenlof wrote:
> Hi Heeren,
>
> You could tag them with a tag you use for people that need more
> research. Or you could just create a person and link them to no one,
> then you could link them after you fi
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:32 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable children
Please see below.
Heeren wrote:
> No, not speaking of behavior, I have a family that has seven children,
> born betwee
When I have a situation like this, I add the child to the possible parents and
make the child's status "challenged". You can change the child's status under
"Children's Settings" (I don't have Legacy open, so I am working from memory).
In the Family tab, right-click on any of the children and ch
Ron Ferguson wrote:
> Please see below.
>
> Heeren wrote:
>> No, not speaking of behavior, I have a family that has seven
>> children, born between 1765 & 1784, all well researched.
>>
>> Another researcher has an eighth child that he shows born abt 1790.
>
> *Caution* Another Researcher. This is,
Please see below.
Heeren wrote:
> No, not speaking of behavior, I have a family that has seven children,
> born between 1765 & 1784, all well researched.
>
> Another researcher has an eighth child that he shows born abt 1790.
*Caution* Another Researcher. This is, of course, a secondary source an
Hi Heeren,
You could tag them with a tag you use for people that need more
research. Or you could just create a person and link them to no one,
then you could link them after you find more information.
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
Heeren wrote:
> No, not speaking of behavior, I have a family that has s
22 matches
Mail list logo
