RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-16 Thread william . murray . anderson
:49 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect The person was related in more than one way - she was a 24th GG-Aunt, and a 27th GGM. I have lots of people related in more than one way to me. My 4th GG-Aunt was also married (as a 2nd wife) to my 5th

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-16 Thread fourpartz
becoming Kings of the Franks. Rich in LA CA - Original Message From: br...@the-lightfoots.com br...@the-lightfoots.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 6:41:45 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect My thoughts exactly. But I might also add

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-16 Thread fourpartz
the great grandchildren  married. Rich in LA CA From: hstov...@gmail.com hstov...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 8:48:46 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect The person was related in more than one way

RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-16 Thread brian
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect I just re-ran my son's line. He was born in the 1970's.Using Blood = 10, Non-blood = 0. His great grandfather, Charlemange is 36th gr 1, 37th 10 times; born 0747 AD. He was born abt 1040 years before descendant. To help

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-16 Thread mikefry
br...@the-lightfoots.com wrote: No, no need to show me your work. As I said in the message, congrats on getting back that far. Many hit that brick wall after 4 or 5 generations. Then again, many of us prefer not to trust the medieval attempts at trying to legitimise undeserved notions of

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-15 Thread fourpartz
Are each of the various 'numbers' accurate, if not the one you would guess is the 'first' choice; Check out Relationship Calculator to get the many multiple pathways. You are related to my kids, so I deal witht the same stuff. It seems the calculation is 'male' checking first and this has been

RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-15 Thread wood_ce
the programming knowledge to solve this one. CE -Original Message- From: kowal...@iglou.com [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:19 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:10:27 -0800, wood

Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-15 Thread stevevoght
I believe there are a few issues here: 1) The relationship is not incorrect -- she is your 24th great-grandaunt, as you have stated yourself. She also happens to be your 27th GGM, and the problem is that you would prefer that the program to always select direct lines instead of side-relations in

RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect

2009-12-15 Thread wood_ce
@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect My thoughts exactly. But I might also add that starting in version 7.0, the relationship calculations must be redone whenever new people are added. It no longer does it on the fly as in previous versions. I would suggest to the OP