On 7 May 2009, at 02:36, SteveC wrote:
Hi
We've put together a practical definition for the OSMFs point of view
on what a substantial extract is, or isn't
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Substantial_Defined
And we'd like help similarly with building a practical
I have done some work on the Substantial Defined wiki article creating
an introduction to the issue and linking to the Use Cases page where
there is discussion of the issue.
I have also created links from the Use Case page and the Open Issues
page from the relevant sections to this article
Peter Miller wrote:
Possibly we should change its name to 'Substantial - Community Norm'
or 'Substantial - Guidance'?
+1: Substantial - Community Norm
/ Grant
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
And we'd like help similarly with building a practical definition of
Produced Work. Here's how the license RC1 defines it:
Obviously this goes hand in hand with the definition of a (derivative)
database; everything you make
Hi,
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Thus it would be allowed to to take
less than 100 features or area of less than 1000 inhabitants and make PD,
Share
alike or commercial derivatives from that without any restrictions. Is my
interpretation right?
There's the problem of the reverse-engineering
-1 Substantial - Community norm
+1 Substantial - Guidance
+1 Substantial - Guideline
-Lauri
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Lauri Hahne wrote:
-1 Substantial - Community norm
+1 Substantial - Guidance
+1 Substantial - Guideline
Page renamed:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Substantial_-_Guideline
Old page has redirect to new page.
/ Grant
