--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Potential-huge-License-violation-anyone-know-anything-about-this-tp5132343p5134100.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailin
A few thoughts. (I spotted this book when it first came out and talked to a
few OSM people about it at the time. A copy, can't remember whose, was being
passed around at the London hack day.)
1. It is clearly an infringement of the attribution requirements in that the
CC-BY-SA licence isn't menti
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Phil Monger wrote:
> Well, Frederik, here is a challenge:
> -Work out a 10 mile cycle trip or walk around your town / city, taking
> advantage of sights you want to see, streets you know are good for it, ect.
> Cycle it once or twice, getting distracted and taking t
>So, in summary:
>
>- No attribution
>- Is a derived work released under Copyright
>
>I assume this hasn't been cleared and 'waived' by someone at OSM? Where can
we go from here?
>
I think that in cases where we can prove such a 'mistake' we should send
them a letter and clearly indicate their wr
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:25:50AM +0100, Phil Monger wrote:
> -Work out a 10 mile cycle trip or walk around your town / city, taking
> advantage of sights you want to see, streets you know are good for it, ect.
> Cycle it once or twice, getting distracted and taking twice as long as
> needed to ta
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
> In addition we
> should put a sentence that they can make donation to OpenStreetMap and the
> community forgets about the mistake. Otherwise the OSMF might take further
> legal actions.
You mean as in
"Dear Mr President, I've got this photo showing you in bed with
>"Dear Mr President, I've got this photo showing you in bed with another
>man, here's my bank account where you can make a donation, in which case
> will forget about it...
>
>... unless I need more money later in which case I might again remember"?
>
>Honestly, what you're suggesting smacks of bl
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
> I just want to create a situation where people are
> aware that abusing OSM data leads to consequences so that is becomes a
> trade-off like not buying a ticket for train.
If too many people use the train without paying then the operator will
go bust.
If too many
2010/6/3 Phil Monger :
> I want OSM to be used in this way, but properly - and with according
> advantages given to end users. Companies *need to know* they
> cannot assert copyright over the mapping they take in this way.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-
