Alex,
Alexrk wrote:
Am I right that such a tourist map could only be published under a CC-like
license again? In other words, if I do so and sell just one copy of that map,
any Big Publishing Co could duplicate and sell the same on its own for
..hmm.. half the price?
Correct.
So if
On 7 June 2010 21:40, Alexrk alex...@yahoo.de wrote:
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 07.06.2010 19:36:
So if that interpretation of CC-BY-SA is correct, practically no one would
be
able to do really creative things with OSM if she or he would like to get a
ROI
on that work?
Our standard reply
Alex,
Alexrk wrote:
You might like AZ (or Falk or whatever) or not - but please don't
underestimate
the creative work of cartographers. Making a good readable, fine-looking
paper
map is far more than installing Mapnik, choosing some color styles and
pressing
the render-button.
I
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 07.06.2010 22:55:
Incidentally that it also the reason why I am against share-alike
licenses - because they are rooted in IP, in the idea that our work of
recording stuff around us somehow entitles us to dictate our terms and
conditions to others. Just like you
Alex,
Alexrk wrote:
Lets assume someone works two weeks - hunch darkly night after night over
Adobe
Illustrator, coming up with a handmade city map of Hamburg. OK voila nice,
now
lets try to sell it in a small edition of printed copies (BoD or whatsoever).
But why should one invest two
