On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 06:01 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
>>
>> Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use
>> cc-by-sa data in the future.
>
> Hence the question, I imagine. :-)
>
> PDDL/CC0 for the data would avoid this question, or dual
On 14 May 2011 18:49, Kolossos wrote:
> This september will be a relative large event from Wikimedia-side across
> europe: "Wiki Loves Monuments". It is a public photo contest around
> monuments (overview of the cultural heritage, also small houses) and we will
> create lists of monuments in Wikip
On 05/14/2011 06:01 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use
cc-by-sa data in the future.
Hence the question, I imagine. :-)
PDDL/CC0 for the data would avoid this question, or dual-licencing
ODbL/BY-SA might be good.
- Rob.
_
Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use
cc-by-sa data in the future.
mike
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kolossos
wrote:
> This september will be a relative large event from Wikimedia-side across
> europe: "Wiki Loves Monuments". It is a public photo contest around
> m
This september will be a relative large event from Wikimedia-side across
europe: "Wiki Loves Monuments". It is a public photo contest around
monuments (overview of the cultural heritage, also small houses) and we
will create lists of monuments in Wikipedia:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Com
Francis Davey writes:
>The ODbL definition of "database" implicitly contains a definition of
>"contents", namely the things that are arranged in a systematic etc
>way. What the "contents" are will depend on the terms of OSMF's
>licence,
I think the 'contents' must depend on the nature of the wor
