Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A case for CT + CC-BY-SA

2011-07-23 Thread John Smith
On 24 July 2011 02:11, Tobias Knerr wrote: > So do I suggest to stop the license change process? No, I don't. The > Contributor Terms will solve many problems on their own, so my > suggestion is what could be labelled "CT + CC-BY-SA". This will cause similar/same problems as CT+ODBL, which stops

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A case for CT + CC-BY-SA

2011-07-23 Thread 80n
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > I apologize in advance for distracting everyone's attention from mapping > and other pleasures with a long mail about licenses. However, I have > begun to seriously doubt the decision to choose ODbL as the one future > OSM license, and believ

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A case for CT + CC-BY-SA

2011-07-23 Thread Mike Dupont
Tobias, thank you for writing this. It seems you are speaking from the hearts of many people. thanks, mike On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > I apologize in advance for distracting everyone's attention from mapping > and other pleasures with a long mail about licenses. Howeve

[OSM-legal-talk] A case for CT + CC-BY-SA

2011-07-23 Thread Tobias Knerr
I apologize in advance for distracting everyone's attention from mapping and other pleasures with a long mail about licenses. However, I have begun to seriously doubt the decision to choose ODbL as the one future OSM license, and believe we should have another look at the license that will ultimate