[changing lists]
On 15 December 2011 13:30, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
On 15/12/2011 13:17, David Groom wrote:
Yes it should be considered a break, because in that case you know what
the
source for moving the nodes was.
Good. Now do the license change impact auditing tools
Continued from a talk@osm thread, as suggested by Mikel Maron.
When I use high-resolution imagery to improve areas formerly mapped from
low-resolution imagery, I change the source tag on the objects I touch -
i.e. from Yahoo low resolution satellite to Microsoft Bing
satellite. Since my edit
On 15 December 2011 15:17, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
When I use high-resolution imagery to improve areas formerly mapped from
low-resolution imagery, I change the source tag on the objects I touch -
i.e. from Yahoo low resolution satellite to Microsoft Bing satellite.
Since my
Some aspect of the licence change is questionning me.
Old anonymous edition (when OSM do not require registering) are
ambigious to me : some say that those edits will be deleted.
But i have some examples (close to me) of old nodes (anonymous) that
where then improved sereval times and that
As what the subjects says, instead of removing and recreating tainted
data, I think it's best (in some cases) to revert to the last known
clean version. Do other tried this approach in re-mapping?
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most
