[OSM-legal-talk] Reposting

2015-11-05 Thread James Michael DuPont
It seems that my mails are being blocked to this list. I would like to start fresh and focus on improving OSM.  So I have been reviewing potential imports/comparisons of the new jersey data.  They would like a :"Acknowledgement of the data set provider, the New Jersey  Office of Information Techno

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)

2015-11-05 Thread Simon Poole
Am 05.11.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > are we going to define "geometry type", "primary feature data" and > "primary map feature"? E.g. is a "multiline string" or a "group of > nodes" a geometry type? > What is a "property" and how is it different to a "primary map > feature" or

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)

2015-11-05 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Thursday 05 November 2015, Simon Poole wrote: > > The text can be found here > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collective_Database_Guideline Looks good. Two observations: - The second example could possibly use clarification that it applies when road classification is solely based on tra

[OSM-legal-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)

2015-11-05 Thread Simon Poole
You may have seen an early version of this either on legal-talk or via WeeklyOSM/WochenNotiz. It's gone through a number of revisions since then and has incorporated input from a number of sources. Thanks to everybody that took the time to work on it. Content wise this version is slightly less tec