Tobias, the best option for ensuring the data is usable by OSM is an
explicit statement of permission for the OpenStreetMap project to
incorporate and use the data under the project's terms. This is generally
considered preferable to a dataset that is ODbL-licensed without such a
statement.
Howeve
I'm very curious about the cc-by compatibility. The Red Cross is doing a
very large mapping project in West Africa, ground truthing a lot of the
data created by remote mappers during ebola. As part of the project we want
to release the data both in OSM and in a more complete form (not all data
gath
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Tobias Wendorff
wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> could you please recommend me licenses for releasing data to ODbL?
> From my point of view, compatible licenses are CC-license without
> "SA" and "BY" and (only if possible) CC0 and PD or finally special
> license, like the f
Diane
Any comment from CC on the -other- issues that have been raised wrt CC
by 4.0 and ODbL compatibility and in general with the way it works for
databases?
Simon
Am 18.03.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Diane Peters:
> Just to be clear on the attribution removal requirement in CC's
> licenses, Erik ass
Just to be clear on the attribution removal requirement in CC's licenses,
Erik asserted:
I wish people would stop releasing data with CC-by; "you have to
attribute us, but you have to remove that attribution when ever we
want you too" which is not present in ODbL so
There is no such absolute
