As insurance is unlikely to be easy to arrange if it were me I would
undertake a risk assessment for venue and mapping and then print off some
A5's with the mitigation measures and make sure OSMers attending understand
they are participating at their own risk and that these were the measures I
iden
ling list
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
--
Cheers
Andy Robinson
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Sent: 02 November 2009 11:52 AM
>To: t...@openstreetmap.org
>Cc: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Illegal activity
>
>Pieren wrote:
>> It's not the question about laws in France, Germany or US vs England.
>> It's the question to know i
Punted to legal-talk
-Original Message-
From: newbies-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:newbies-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Chris Brierley
Sent: 30 October 2009 9:22 PM
To: newb...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-newbies] Attribution
Hi all,
Quick question if anyone is able to
Ed Avis wrote:
>Sent: 15 October 2009 11:34 AM
>To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] FW: Crown copyright dates ( OS Reference
>72267)
>
>Barnett, Phillip writes:
>
>>The crux point is what triggers a new copyright date.
>>
>>Guidance notes from the OPSI -
>
>>"A reprint
o argue the
>point, if you don't mind my quoting your correspondence. Otherwise I'll
>just point him to the OPSI guidance)
>
>Cheers
>Phillip
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:legal-talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.o
gt;WC1X 8XZ
>UNITED KINGDOM
>T +44 (0)20 7430 4474
>F
>E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk
>http://WWW.ITN.CO.UK
>P Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
>-Original Message-
>
>From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:legal-talk-
>
As I suspected the OS has taken a hard line with respect to copyright and
publication date.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Customer Services [mailto:customerservi...@ordnancesurvey.co.uk]
Sent: 13 October 2009 2:10 PM
To: blackadder...@googlemail.com
Subject: Crown copyright dates
I've mad a further FOI request to the OS today seeking clarification with
respect to those OS maps that do not carry a Crown Copyright (c) date. This
is the case with a lot of the First edition 1:25,000 sheets which have a
published date and a separate corrections/changes/additions date. I'm very
m
Can someone drop Alan a line with some pointers.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: Alan Rowe [mailto:a...@potting-shed-cartoons.co.uk]
>Sent: 07 July 2009 1:28 PM
>To: secret...@osmfoundation.org
>Subject: OSM map usage
>
>Hi Andy,
>
>I work as an self employed illustrator on the I
Peter Miller wrote:
>Sent: 26 June 2009 2:58 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Privacy and Terms
>
>
>I fully support the process of adding a clear legal framework to the
>project but the terms and conditions and license can't be considered
>in isolation wi
Andy Allan wrote:
>Sent: 18 June 2009 6:29 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant
>
>On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm wishing that we could protect the
>> database as a database of geodata, wh
"(contract fusion, database fission and
anti-copyright-matter)". Inspired :-)
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:legal-talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andy Allan
>Sent: 25 March 2009 7:09 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal di
Using the last date is the approach I take for the 1:25,000
provisional/first edition maps I'm collecting. Most don't have a copyright
date but luckily I have the excellent book on the 1:25,000 series written by
Peter Hellyer which confirms what year a particular map edition/print
edition appeared
Liz wrote:
>Sent: 12 March 2009 10:31 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License Telephone Debate
>
>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Nick Black wrote:
>> > I've always felt that you were completely aligned behind the aims of
>OSM
>> > - we can
Ciprian Talaba:
>Sent: 12 March 2009 9:28 AM
>To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Possible datasources: Corine Land Cover
>2000dataset
>
>Hi all,
>
>I know the discussion lately have been towards agreeing about an OSM
>license, and probably this is not the best time to ask t
Peter Miller wrote:
>Sent: 02 March 2009 8:57 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Who is ODC and why do we trust them?
>
>
>On 2 Mar 2009, at 08:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>Grant wrote in his announcement:
>>
>> "... Therefore, we have worked wit
Rob Myers wrote:
>Sent: 26 January 2009 9:58 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 23rd Dec board meeting
>
>MJ Ray wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, once the trademark registration is confirmed (no
>> matter who to), unauthorised commercial use of the mark bec
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 22 January 2009 11:10 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing Working Group report, 2009/01/22
>
>Hi,
>
>Mikel Maron wrote:
>> We want to move ahead with this draft of the license asap. The license
>won't be perfect,
>> but
Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org] wrote:
>Sent: 19 January 2009 2:39 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: 'Licensing and other legal discussions.'
>Subject: Re: OSMF board meeting minutes for December 2008?
>
>Hi,
>
>Andy Robinson (blackadder-li
9 11:49 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.; Andy Robinson (blackadder-
>lists)
>Subject: OSMF board meeting minutes for December 2008?
>
>Hi,
>
>I know it's been the festive season and we're all still not done
>eating all the left over chocolate but
es back with a
>'nothing found' for any search. It is also inconvenient when one wants to
>quote from the minutes.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>
>Peter
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andy Robinson (OSMF) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2008 4:11 PM
To: 'Peter Miller'; 'Licensing and other legal discussions.'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: updated AGM pages for 2007 and 2008 and comments about
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 14 October 2008 12:55 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence brief/Use Case - final callfor
>comments
>
>Andy,
>
>Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
>> You are already aware that the OSMF
Simon Ward wrote:
>Sent: 14 October 2008 12:32 AM
>To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License License License
>
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:44:07PM +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
>>
>>> Going back to the newly uploaded draft [1]. Maybe it'
Peter Miller wrote:
>Sent: 17 September 2008 10:17 AM
>To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org; 'Etienne'; 'SteveC'
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] The Open Data Licence page on the wiki has
>notbeen updated since April 2008
>
>I notice that the Open Data Licence page on the OSM wiki has not been
>updated sinc
Brian Quinion wrote:
>Sent: 21 August 2008 2:49 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Mass import of TeleAtlas data
>
>As an aside,
>
>I was unable to find any information / suggestions / procedure
>documented on the wiki as what to do if you suspect someone
I have written to this user to request clarification.
cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:legal-talk-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederik Ramm
>Sent: 21 August 2008 1:48 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Mass i
Kristian,
I suspect that what you are looking for is permission from the commercial
partner to derive data from those images. This is what OpenStreetMap has as
an agreement with Yahoo! However to keep control of the issue the WMS would
need to be restricted in some way, perhaps by offering it as a
Frederik,
Things have not stood still although we are currently reliant on the good
will of others to help the process along. The proposed Open Database
Licence, now called the ODbL licence for short, was updated/improved by
Jordan a few weeks ago. The OSMF board have reviewed it and are very happ
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Sent: 07 April 2008 5:09 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Crown copyright, OS and year of publication
>
>Tim Sheerman-Chase wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Out_of_copyright
>>
>> Is that interpretation about
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 03 April 2008 8:36 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Reverse Geocoding
>
>Hi,
>
>> > What's your opinion? And would it change should the proposed new
>> > license
>> > get adopted?
>>
>> a. It's a bit of a moot point, because C
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Sent: 03 April 2008 8:25 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Reverse Geocoding
>
>Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> What's your opinion? And would it change should the proposed new
>> license
>> get adopted?
>
>a. It's a bit of a moot poin
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 19 March 2008 3:00 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License update
>
>Hi,
>
>> Bully for you. What's in it for other participants? More abuse that
>> they can't give conclusive answers and aren't not qualified lawyers?
>
>We
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Sent: 18 March 2008 10:54 AM
>To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] import of dataset for new zealand
>
>Robin Paulson wrote:
>
>> (c) Crown Copyright
>
>w00t, Robin found his Shift key! ;)
>
>> even with 5 of these displayed on screen at any one
Robin Paulson wrote:
>Sent: 18 March 2008 9:42 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.; List for OpenMoko community
>discussion
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] import of dataset for new zealand
>
>land information new zealand is a government org that holds data on
>roads and properties for the en
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 20 February 2008 10:33 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Deconstructing the "loss of data" claim
>
>Hi,
>
>> Interspersed within all the facts in the OSM data dump are a number
>> of non-factual elements. There are both accide
Jochen Topf wrote:
>Sent: 20 February 2008 8:08 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Beeing pragmatic
>
>Hi!
>
>This projects prides itself to be pragmatic. In fact, Steves pragmatism
>founded this project. His willingness to say: I don't care what other
>people
On 19/02/2008, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The issue was quite simple. We need to have a license that better
> > protects the OSM data
>
> Do we? What's the threat? How has it been assessed?
I'm not aware of a threat being received but a number of individuals
and some lega
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 07 February 2008 9:22 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Progressing OSM to a new
>dataLicence regime
>
>Hi,
>
>> There are negative sides to a copyright assignment. A) We probably
>> wouldn't get one from e.g. AND or
tim wrote:
>Sent: 04 February 2008 11:32 AM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Progressing OSM to a new data Licence regime
>
>Hello,
>
>Few clarifications and questions about use cases.
>
>If I distribute web mapping of my special company data and OSM, I
>do
41 matches
Mail list logo
