+1 for both items
On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
Dear All,
LWG would like feedback on a couple of items relating to cleaning
tainted data as we all prepare for the data base transition.
Draft minutes are here.
On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think it would be good to have a tag that mappers can use to say this
object is clean, I have personally checked the history and/or reverted it to
a relicensable state, any contributions by non-agreeing users are not present
in the
On 2 Sep 2010, at 4:52 , TimSC wrote:
To LWG,
cc legal talk
You have not provided an acknowledgement of my recent emails of 11th Aug,
18th Aug (beyond Grant's message of 27th July). Obviously, you are busy but I
also don't have time to keep going through my emails and your minutes to
Hi
Isn't this a violation of the osm copyright? Can't find any attribution on
the website.
http://hotpads.com/search/#lat=37.34232140492519lon=-121.85159683227539zoom=24listingTypes=rental,sublet,room,corporateincludeVaguePricing=falseloan=30,0.0525,0visible=new,viewed,favorite
What should be
:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Ciprian Talaba
cipriantal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Apo,
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Isn't this a violation of the osm copyright? Can't find any
attribution
on the website.
http://hotpads.com/search
