Hello Kathleen,
thank you for your clarifications.
On 09/23/2020 at 02:42 PM Kathleen Lu via legal-talk wrote:
GITNE,
I don't know what distinction you are drawing between opinion and legal
assessment. I cannot give you legal advice as I am not your lawyer, but my legal
opinion, based o
database per se) content at all?
Regards
GITNE
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Hello Frederik,
On 09/23/2020 at 01:16 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 23.09.20 12:34, GITNE wrote:
The issue is not availability of the data but Slack *republishing*
content
Surely Slack is doing that not out of their own decision, but because
someone has instructed them (or their web
On 09/23/2020 at 12:18 PM Andy Townsend wrote:
On 23/09/2020 08:49, GITNE wrote:
Unfortunately, no. I do not use Slack. So, I cannot provide a specific link or
something. What I know is that @SomeoneElse reported that Slack has an automated
feed which pulls changesets comments from OSM and
posed to be
published.
Regards
GITNE
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 09/23/2020 at 03:45 AM Kathleen Lu via legal-talk wrote:
Hi GITNE,
Can you also specify what you think the problem is?
I am not sure if I can be more specific. So, I am just going to reword what I
have written so that perhaps then things become clearer. In my understanding the
Contributor
On 09/23/2020 at 02:19 AM Clifford Snow wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:43 PM GITNE mailto:gi...@gmx.de>>
wrote:
Hello OSMF Legal Team,
due to a quite troubling revelation by @SomeoneElse that changeset comments
are
automatically republished by the third party private c
, yet they are still publicly available
and thus enable full transparency. So, there is really no need for others to
reproduce them, especially for profit.
Regards
GITNE
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
