Hello Frederik,

On 09/23/2020 at 01:16 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,

On 23.09.20 12:34, GITNE wrote:
The issue is not availability of the data but Slack *republishing*
content

Surely Slack is doing that not out of their own decision, but because
someone has instructed them (or their web service) to do so?

*Irony Warning*
Wait, so you are saying that things can happen just like that on their service
and they are not responsible, not even partially, for what is happening? I did
not know this could be a viable defense strategy. Okay, next time I screw up I
am going to defend myself by blaming orders I had to follow.
*End of Irony*
Or, did I get something wrong?

(for profit) which presumably is not covered either by the ODbL

Assuming that the data is covered by ODbL, then "These rights explicitly
include commercial use, and do not exclude any field of endeavour."
(section 3.0)

Right, assuming. ;-) Please, do not get me wrong, I am okay with profit.
However, only as long as it is legal.

Regards
GITNE

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to