t; Hi,
>
> On 02.12.20 09:49, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> > As I said I am paying for this out of my own money and do not want the
> > storage space to be used for purposes other than panos of walking trails.
>
> I think you have already done *much* more than can be expected of
Hello Martn,
I believe I 'probably' don't have any obligation, but I am just being
cautious as we do appear to live in a very litigious world and I just want
to be safe. It's a case of whether there is some automatic 'implied rights'
for users when there are no terms of service.
I don't have any
Hello everyone,
Apologies - this is not directly related to OpenStreetMap itself but is
related to a site of mine which uses OpenStreetMap data so I thought I'd
post my question here to get opinions.
I have been developing a site OpenTrailView (https://opentrailview.org) to
collect 360 panoramas
If it's SRTM it's just public domain isn't it? So if the resulting database is
under ODBL I can't see that being a problem.
Very much IANAL.
Nick
-Peter K wrote: -
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Peter K
Date: 04/07/2013 09:05AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Elevation / SRTM data
Hi,
Just wondering what the current state of what we can do with the UK council
footpath open data is?
Generally I don't just copy the data into OSM anyway: it's more fun to survey
:-)
However I'm wondering whether we can do this?
1. Use the council data to verify whether a footpath surveyed
>> Second issue : it is maybe a more specific French issue here because
>> the "routes" themselves can be copyrighted when they are considered as
>> "original work". A famous case confirmed this with the IGN (publishing
>> the FFRP maps) sueing a guidebook editor [5] and confirmed by the
>> highest
-Steve Bennett wrote: -
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions."
From: Steve Bennett
Date: 22/02/2013 03:12AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Question about copyrighted hiking routes in
France
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Pieren wrote:
> First issue : it is the hiking r
IANAL but just a thought... is it legal anyway to copyright route references?
That is what the GRs appear to me to be to my eyes.
Can the Department of Transport copyright the reference "M25" in the uk and
prohibit its use in all other publications?
Nick
-Pieren wrote: -
To: legal-ta
It is a bit frightening that this sort of thing is required for a mapping
party! Why is the, to my mind, utterly common-sense "do it at your own risk, if
you have an accident it's YOUR responsibility, not ours" attitude so alien to
the world today?
In other words you shouldn't need insurance,
Hello Gregory,
The quotes are used to quote the email. So the 'so in summary...' bit is mine
and the 'so in short' is theirs.
Nick
-Gregory wrote: -
To: Nick Whitelegg
From: Gregory
Date: 11/06/2012 02:02PM
Cc: talk...@openstreetmap.org, legal-talk@openstree
Hello everyone,
Re: the Hampshire ROW data - this is the response I got from the person I am in
contact with.
"In answer to the queries below, the data is free to use as is the OS
open data on their website.
The data was originally captured against the 10k raster data, meaning it
carried OS IP
Hello Rob, (and all)
I've emailed the Hants CC guy once - he was away so the email bounced.
I've emailed him again tonight.
Nick
-Rob Nickerson wrote: -
To: talk...@openstreetmap.org, nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk,
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Rob Nickerson
Date: 08/06/2012 04:27
memory,
most of my remapping sp far has been based on 6-month old mapping trips from
last summer/autumn) rather than copying tags from the old CC-SA.
Nick
-Nick Whitelegg wrote: -
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
From: Nick Whitelegg
Date: 09/03/2012 11:50AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk
>That's a big presumption. I would have expected that remapping would be done
>as
>a strictly 'clean room' operation, without looking at the existing CC-BY-SA
>data
>at all, but that doesn't seem to be happening.
Isn't not "looking at" existing CC-by-SA data a little OTT? We may as well
forge
>I agree. Another reason not to is that the looming deadline is actually
>motivating people to stop waiting for CT-undecideds to respond and do
>remapping - I know it's motivating me and other people I've talked to.
>Take away the deadline and you demotivate remappers, while also putting
>off t
Hi,
As I've indicated already, in my local area - Hampshire - there are very large
numbers of footpaths contributed by a former mapper who has declined the CTs
and so obviously I'm concerned about the impact of April 1st.
Remapping these on the ground is going to be a huge job and something I'm
Had an experience yesterday which raises an interesting legal question. Around
Easter 2010, IIRC, I surveyed what appeared to be a footpath in good faith: the
footpath sign appeared to point down a gravel track across a field. Yesterday,
as part of another mapping expedition, I followed said fo
17 matches
Mail list logo
