it's a derivated, therefore share alike. I'm glad they trusted OSM data.
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, 15:25 , wrote:
> Dear IANALs,
>
> I'm sorry to ask an additional question.
>
> A while ago, I've listened to a talk about navigation of pupils from their
> home to the school - it was used to decide whe
that's unfair, it is free, you don't have to pay for it. it just has a
license, or else map companies would use our data
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, 02:19 , wrote:
>
> I didn't expected OpenStreetMap to be such non-free and permissive :-(
>
___
legal-talk mai
US and
there is no US database protection law), a "derivative work" needs
quite a bit of the original to qualify. The meaning of a "derivative
work" was always much narrower than what a colloquial understanding of
what "derived" might be, and the change in license d
these new Liberal interpretation of ODbL are funny. to bad it's not
documented what we wanted when we changed license. seems to be full of lies
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Historic/We_Are_Changing_The_License
*"This means that “good guys” are stopped from using our data but the “b
does contain derivate however,which means license applies
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, 19:46 , wrote:
> > we are here to create more open data, not to feed proprietary data than
> is lock under their TOS.
>
> I want to apologize for my misunderstanding: my final product does not
> contain any OpenStreet
https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/index.html
the license is quite clear and 4.2 applies to the case you mention. any use
of OSM data (over 100 nodes) combined with proprietary data results in more
open data under ODbL.
we are here to create more open data, not to feed proprietary data t
Extracting than 100 elements (non repeatable) from the databse accounts
for substantial.
Costs has nothing to do with the license.
https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/index.html
Às 20:20 de 10/10/2019, Lars-Daniel Weber escreveu:
First of all, thanks for your answer. I had a long
well OSMF as the licensor can terminate the company rights under ODbL.
Às 21:07 de 08/10/2019, Mateusz Konieczny escreveu:
8 Oct 2019, 20:36 by nunocapelocalde...@gmail.com:
Up until they got contacted by OSMF to fix the attribution,
nothing will happen and won't comply. They do not r
about their choice of using HERE, I'm not aware of the reason. OSM road
network in Portugal is quite good.
A terça, 8/10/2019, 20:39, Nuno Caldeira
escreveu:
> you understood me wrong. I meant it was a good example of compliance. it's
> a fair and correct solution. don't
you understood me wrong. I meant it was a good example of compliance. it's
a fair and correct solution. don't understand why others (including OSMF
corporate members) don't do the same.
A terça, 8/10/2019, 20:37, Clifford Snow escreveu:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 a
Sadly i have contacted them before. Not fixed.
Also keep in mind that Moveit lists us as "partners", which we
obviously don't https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tranzmate
Karta also does not
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kartatech.karta.gps
and the funny
11 matches
Mail list logo
