On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:02:26PM -0700, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
From what I understand, under the new license, any dataset that we
build in-house based on the geometry or tags of data in the
transportation layer, which we choose to release to our client or
other parties, would have to be
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:58:19AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
their aerial imagery from. - Ed Parsons once said that Google had to pay
extra for traceable aerial imagery as the normal licenses would not
have been suitable for using the material in an application like
MapMaker. If none of
Chris Browet has been working on getting Yahoo map support in
Merkaartor. His first implementation downloaded tiles directly
from Yahoo. On advice from the OSM community we disabled this
since it was felt this would go against the Terms of Usage of Yahoo :
we had to use the flash of javascript API
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:35:26PM +0300, SteveC wrote:
http://geo.topf.org/comparison/index.html?mt0=googlemapmt1=mapniklon=-0.343705lat=39.48158z=17
Is it just me or does this link not work in ie7?
cu bart
___
legal-talk mailing list
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:19:15PM +0100, 80n wrote:
If you publish OpenStreetMap data you can satisfy the attribution
requirement of the license by linking to or referencing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Attribution;
Discuss.
+1.
cu bart
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:50:48AM +, SteveC wrote:
No, the total opposite.
We only found out about some of the implications of certain use cases,
and how it makes some use a bit easier, when we sat down with Jordan
in a cafe and threw around ideas and scenarios.
Please don't try
