Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT-compatible data recycling imported nodes

2012-04-07 Thread rhn
characteristic of open-source projects) are much harder now than a few years earlier, I might abandon OSM if this gets thrown away. I'm writing all this precisely because I don't want this to happen. Cheers, rhn The v0 rule essentially states that allocating an object in the DB doesn't create IP

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT-compatible data recycling imported nodes

2012-03-30 Thread rhn
Am 29.03.2012 19:16, schrieb rhn: On a side note, relying on such a decision would be ironic - a lot of data I imported were only a copy of a PD map :) Cheers, rhn Unluckily that the original source was PD doesn't make a difference (legally), what counts is the licence you received

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT-compatible data recycling imported nodes

2012-03-29 Thread rhn
, relying on such a decision would be ironic - a lot of data I imported were only a copy of a PD map :) Cheers, rhn The v0 rule essentially states that allocating an object in the DB doesn't create IP, so if you have an object that has lost all of the attributes it originally had

[OSM-legal-talk] CT-compatible data recycling imported nodes

2012-03-28 Thread rhn
the license change? If not, is there any other way to preserve the data? Cheers, rhn ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT-compatible data recycling imported nodes

2012-03-28 Thread rhn
://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28099539/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28099452/history Could you point me to the v0 rule you're referring to? Cheers, rhn If you essentially remapped the objects it may be that some or most of your data would be safe due to the v0 rule (regardless of any

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What should be considered legal?

2009-10-28 Thread rhn
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Thanks. The reason I asked that was that I frequently forget where the GPS trace was taken - was it a road or a track, which village or whatever else. This usually happens in areas where OSM map is pitch white :) Yahoo maps aren't very helpful there either.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What should be considered legal?

2009-10-25 Thread rhn
Matt Amos wrote: On 10/24/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/10/21 rhn opstmaac@porcupinefactory.org: I'm a mapper for more than a year, and I know a little bit about intellectual property, but some questions have been puzzling me for quite some time. First

[OSM-legal-talk] What should be considered legal?

2009-10-21 Thread rhn
hope someone could explain it to me :) Cheers rhn ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk