On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 05:05:00AM +, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
> > This needs a safeguard to allow for email addresses temporarily not
> > working. I’m not even sure this is the right thing to do anyway. It’s
> > far safer getting rid of a user’s data than it is assuming ownership of
> > it.
>
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Simon Ward wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:30:41AM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
>> Creative Commons license (by-sa). or under the ODbL. If you choose not to
>> give us your email address, or your email address stops working, you
>> waive all right to ownership of
Simon Ward writes:
>
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:30:41AM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
> > Creative Commons license (by-sa). or under the ODbL. If you choose not to
> > give us your email address, or your email address stops working, you
> > waive all right to ownership of your edits.
>
> This n
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:22:36PM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Why? If the owner of the data ever shows up, they can 1) agree to any
> changes in the license, or 2) ask to have their data removed. I don't
> see much value in removing the data now on the chance that we might have
> to remove
I see your point. Data potentially infringing if removed now could be
recreated now, making later bookkeeping easier.
On Mar 1, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Russ Nelson wrote:
I don't see much value in removing the data now on the chance that
we might have
to remove it late
Hi,
Russ Nelson wrote:
> I don't see much value in removing the data now on the chance that we might
> have
> to remove it later.
Viral licenses are called viral for a reason. If you have to remove
something it is always good to do so before it has infected a lot of
other things.
Or more pra
On Mar 1, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Simon Ward wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:30:41AM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
Creative Commons license (by-sa). or under the ODbL. If you choose
not to
give us your email address, or your email address stops working, you
waive all right to ownership of your edits
On Mar 1, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Russ Nelson schrieb:
[...], or your email address
stops working, you waive all right to ownership of your edits.
Probably about as legally binding as posting a note on the site that
says "By reading this you agree to sacrifice your fir
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:30:41AM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Creative Commons license (by-sa). or under the ODbL. If you choose not to
> give us your email address, or your email address stops working, you
> waive all right to ownership of your edits.
This needs a safeguard to allow for email
