[OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-17 Thread Marc Roussel
Hi, i'm consultant in GIS and cartography domain. Can i use OSM shape data for my work?  I make and sell digital maps, and i sell may compositions in raster format.  My end product is an elaboration  datas, vector + raster. My question is if i can use OSM shape data for sale my etaboration rasters

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-17 Thread Tyler
Hi Marc, I am not a lawyer, and I don't speak with any authority on either the legal implications of the license or on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation. And no part of this e-mail constitutes legal advice, talk to a lawyer familiar with intellectual property law. The data for OSM is licensed

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Russ Nelson wrote: > Yes, but your result has to be licensed under the CC-By-SA, > which means that in principle, somebody could republish your > composition. In practice, nobody has complained about that. Or rather, in practice, people simply haven't made the maps precisely because of this. c

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread SteveC
On 18 Jun 2009, at 08:09, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Russ Nelson wrote: >> Yes, but your result has to be licensed under the CC-By-SA, >> which means that in principle, somebody could republish your >> composition. In practice, nobody has complained about that. > > Or rather, in practice, peopl

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Russ Nelson
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Russ Nelson wrote: >> Yes, but your result has to be licensed under the CC-By-SA, >> which means that in principle, somebody could republish your >> composition. In practice, nobody has complained about that. > > Or rather, in practice, p

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russ Nelson wrote: > Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm wishing that we could protect the > database as a database of geodata, whilst simultaneously allowing > people to make derivative works that AREN'T a database of geodata, > whilst also avoiding the TIGER trap of pro

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Andy Allan wrote: >Sent: 18 June 2009 6:29 PM >To: Licensing and other legal discussions. >Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant > >On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russ Nelson wrote: > >> Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm wishing that we could protect the >>

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Russ Nelson wrote: SteveC wrote: Andy Allan wrote: > [...] Wow, I knew CloudMade had developed some really cool OSM-related products, but I had no idea a Fast Acting Synchronised Legal-Talk Trolling Squadron was one of them. :p cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabbl

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Russ Nelson wrote: > SteveC wrote: > Andy Allan wrote: >> [...] > > Wow, I knew CloudMade had developed some really cool OSM-related products, > but I had no idea a Fast Acting Synchronised Legal-Talk Trolling Squadron > was one of them. Come on, isn't it nice to h

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-19 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Russ Nelson wrote: > SteveC wrote: > Andy Allan wrote: >> [...] > > Wow, I knew CloudMade had developed some really cool OSM-related products, > but I had no idea a Fast Acting Synchronised Legal-Talk Trolling Squadron > was one of them.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-19 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Jueves, 18 de Junio de 2009, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) escribió: > >If only we had a license that combined "contract fusion, database > >fission and anti-copyright-matter" together into something that does > >just that! All hail the ODbL! > > That sounds like soup. OSM does dragons. Hhh

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-19 Thread Mike Collinson
At 06:00 PM 18/06/2009, Russ Nelson wrote: >On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> >> Russ Nelson wrote: >>> Yes, but your result has to be licensed under the CC-By-SA, >>> which means that in principle, somebody could republish your >>> composition. In practice, nobody has co