If you are an OSMF member then you should have received an email about this
vote, which contains a URL with which you can access this site. If you have not
received an email, first please check your spam folder then, if it still cannot
be found, contact the OSMF membership secretary: membership
Is there a place to post questions?
My question is this. Can I agree to the Contributor Terms without agreeing
to the contract governing the ODbL. I live in the United States, where
factual databases are public domain, and while I have no problem with OSM
using my contributions in any way whatso
I’ve received the mail, answered the poll, and also the preference poll.
In the preference poll, I understand the term “viral license” but ask
that people refrain from using that term: It has the implication that
it is a bad thing - it may be in some peoples’ minds, but while we’re
trying to prev
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
> but while we’re
> trying to prevent all sides equally
Preventing all sides equally is indeed something we're aiming at, with
all our hearts ;-)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
__
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:43:09AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > but while we’re
> > trying to prevent all sides equally
>
> Preventing all sides equally is indeed something we're aiming at, with
> all our hearts ;-)
Yes, thanks for that. I noticed not long after I sent the mail, but
didn’t
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Simon Ward wrote:
> alternative term is “reciprocal license”.
"Share Alike license" seems like he correct term since that is in our
current license.
Viral is a weasel word, bellow the belt.
___
legal-talk mailing list
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:09:30PM +0100, Mike Collinson wrote:
> I believe there was a discussion that "viral" does necessarily mean
> "reciprocal", hence the use of the word. I'll check tomorrow if no one else
> comes back.
If you get down to various meanings already documented in English,
nei
