2010/6/3 Phil Monger :
> I want OSM to be used in this way, but properly - and with according
> advantages given to end users. Companies *need to know* they
> cannot assert copyright over the mapping they take in this way.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
> I just want to create a situation where people are
> aware that abusing OSM data leads to consequences so that is becomes a
> trade-off like not buying a ticket for train.
If too many people use the train without paying then the operator will
go bust.
If too many
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Potential-huge-License-violation-anyone-know-anything-about-this-tp5132343p5135013.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
> In addition we
> should put a sentence that they can make donation to OpenStreetMap and the
> community forgets about the mistake. Otherwise the OSMF might take further
> legal actions.
You mean as in
"Dear Mr President, I've got this photo showing you in bed with
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 01:25:50AM +0100, Phil Monger wrote:
> -Work out a 10 mile cycle trip or walk around your town / city, taking
> advantage of sights you want to see, streets you know are good for it, ect.
> Cycle it once or twice, getting distracted and taking twice as long as
> needed to ta
n to OSM data. If nothing happens many
companies might take advantage...
Regards,
Oliver
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Potential-huge-License-violation-anyone-know-anything-about-this-tp5132343p5134658.html
Sent
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Phil Monger wrote:
> Well, Frederik, here is a challenge:
> -Work out a 10 mile cycle trip or walk around your town / city, taking
> advantage of sights you want to see, streets you know are good for it, ect.
> Cycle it once or twice, getting distracted and taking t
this.
>>
>> As I said, I would be quite cross if someone were to distribute scanned
>> copies of my book because I don't believe that depicting OSM maps in it
>> makes the whole thing derived.
>>
>> But it is an interesting question - if someone violates C
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Potential-huge-License-violation-anyone-know-anything-about-this-tp5132343p5134100.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk
Well, Frederik, here is a challenge:
-Work out a 10 mile cycle trip or walk around your town / city, taking
advantage of sights you want to see, streets you know are good for it, ect.
Cycle it once or twice, getting distracted and taking twice as long as
needed to take photographs on the way round
Hi,
Phil Monger wrote:
> This is entirely derivative. The maps and route descriptions operate
> together as *one piece of work* - indeed descriptions of the ways, place
> names, distances, directions (ect) used in *the text* are taken from
> *the mapping*. The text couldn't / wouldn't be there
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Phil,
>
> Phil Monger wrote:
>> It's a new cycle book for London, with routes, etc. Pretty standard
>> fare. The problem? All the maps inside are blatant OSM copies (Mapnik, I
>> assume) with route overlays posted. Now this wouldn't be a prob
Frederick,
I appreciate your view on this. but I must passionately disagree.
"Collected works" is set up to allow multiple sets of data / licenses to
operate together under one "bound" work. For example, a book of collected
maps about London could include OSM as CC-BY-SA but in itself, as a
colle
Phil,
Phil Monger wrote:
> It's a new cycle book for London, with routes, etc. Pretty standard
> fare. The problem? All the maps inside are blatant OSM copies (Mapnik, I
> assume) with route overlays posted. Now this wouldn't be a problem,
> obviously, except they are way WAY outside of CC-BY-S
That's actually a pretty bad way to resolve the issue, since the publisher is
liable for damages and you can absolve them of that and make things far worse
by individually contacting or publishing these infringements pre-emptively.
Unless you have a law degree.
Individuals enforcing infringeme
The LWG has been working with council on similar infringement cases. I suggest
this gets added.
As an aside, this is exactly what happened to some of my work a few years ago.
On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Phil Monger wrote:
> So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came acros
On 2 June 2010 21:03, Phil Monger wrote:
> So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came across
> this one (i've hosted the images 3rd party and avoided HTML, if
> they don't work let me know. I had to snap them on the iPhone - so sorry for
> the lack of a close focus!!) :
Hi
So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came across
this one (i've hosted the images 3rd party and avoided HTML, if
they don't work let me know. I had to snap them on the iPhone - so sorry for
the lack of a close focus!!) :
http://img249.imageshack.us/i/img0002tw.jpg/
It's a
18 matches
Mail list logo
