Anthony"
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions."
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing
TermsofUse?
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
It may be true that tracing aerial images (wha
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
> Because your statement is simply wrong in the generality you made it.
Then show why I'm wrong, don't say that I may be right in some
jurisdictions and you aren't sure if I'm right in others.
> For example in Germany simple "Lichtbilder" (whi
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Slater"
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions."
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing
TermsofUse?
On 19 December 2010 16:53, David Groom wrote:
Have
>> And now add to that we have explit permission to use the imagery
>
> I've repeatedly asked where is the explicit permission to use Bing Imagery
> to create derived works
The explicit permission is to use the imagery to update OSM: "any
updates you make to the OpenStreetMap map via the Appl
David (& some others),
David Groom wrote:
I've repeatedly asked where is the explicit permission to use Bing
Imagery to create derived works, all the only answer is "we have it".
As I've said before if its there please show us where it is.
Just out of interest; why are we having this convers
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>> And now add to that we have explit permission to use the imagery
>>
>> I've repeatedly asked where is the explicit permission to use Bing Imagery
>> to create derived works
>
> The explicit permission is to use the imagery to update OSM: "an
