Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Voluntary re-licansing and CT 1.1

2010-10-05 Thread Mike Collinson
At 09:03 AM 5/10/2010, Jukka Rahkonen wrote: >Ed Avis writes: > >> Perhaps there should be a meta-contributor-terms where you agree to >> accept future >> contributor terms proposed by the OSMF. Then there wouldn't be the need to >> re-ask everybody each time the contributor terms change. > >Ins

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Voluntary re-licansing and CT 1.1

2010-10-05 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Ed Avis writes: > Perhaps there should be a meta-contributor-terms where you agree to > accept future > contributor terms proposed by the OSMF. Then there wouldn't be the need to > re-ask everybody each time the contributor terms change. Insurance companies would love this idea :) However, I c

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Voluntary re-licansing and CT 1.1

2010-10-04 Thread Ed Avis
Perhaps there should be a meta-contributor-terms where you agree to accept future contributor terms proposed by the OSMF. Then there wouldn't be the need to re-ask everybody each time the contributor terms change. -- Ed Avis ___ legal-talk mailing