On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:43:57AM -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
> in a RDBMS table. For example, you could use a RDBMS as a k-v
> store and store both OSM data and a completely unrelated set
> of photos in it. On the other hand, you could use a schema which
I guess I was just trying to make the (t
> From: John Bazik [mailto:m...@johnbazik.com]
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] sharealike trigger
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
> > What do you mean by fields?
>
> I mean columns in RDBMS tables.
I don't believe you can make any
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
> What do you mean by fields?
I mean columns in RDBMS tables.
> One description for the OSM map database (planet.osm) is a database of
> georeferenced shapes (including points) with associated data (what the shape
> represents) and meta
> From: John Bazik [mailto:m...@johnbazik.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 9:55 PM
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] sharealike trigger
>
> > Well there's a pretty strong precedent by the largest user of OSM data
> > t
I see that most serious uses of OSM would be substantial. It's really
the qualitative part that I find difficult to parse.
> It sounds like you're confusing computer science and RDMS databases with the
> legal concept of a database. For the rest of this message, I'm talking about
> the legal conc
On 22/07/13 11:46, Paul Norman wrote:
From: John Bazik [mailto:jba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] sharealike trigger
What consitutes substantial? I've read many threads on this, but I
find myself no more able to determine what that mig
> From: John Bazik [mailto:jba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 10:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] sharealike trigger
>
> What consitutes substantial? I've read many threads on this, but I
> find myself no more able to determine what that might be.
If
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:16:42PM -0700, Mikel Maron wrote:
> Maybe a clarification to the "Fairhurst Doctrine", which is that the trigger
> is pulled if the database referencing an osm foreign key contains
> "substantial" data that could be in OSM itself. For instance, we don't want
> restaura
me cases.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>
> From: John Bazik
>To: legal-t...@lists.openstreetmap.org
>Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:06 AM
>Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] sharealike trigger
>
>
>I have read a lot about
I have read a lot about the ODBL, including many threads on this list.
I remain uncertain about what uses of osm data are allowed and what
are not.
The most subjective clause appears to be the one that differentiates
between a collective work and a derivative work. The tipping point is
referred t
10 matches
Mail list logo
