Hi there,
I would like to have clarification on this subject as well (but be aware
that I'm just in the process of understanding the OSM license -> see the
other thread).
What I do not understand with the OSM license is the following
(constructed) example:
* I have a separate geo coder applicat
On 14/06/13 07:09, Michal Palenik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Olov McKie wrote:
Geocoding and license implications
Manual geocoding of an entity that a person has prior local knowledge of, is
the same process as adding a new entity to the OSM, and as such the person
geocod
Robert Whittaker (OSM lists writes:
>
> I'd still very much like to hear of potential use cases, where
> regarding the "inputted search data plus returned coordinates" as a
> derivative database (which may be part of a collective database with
> other proprietary data in it) would actually caus
2013/6/14 Olov McKie
> I would suspect that if a license dispute about OSM ever end up in court,
> we will not be able to argue for more copyright protection than what we
> gave to those contributors who did not want the license to change. I would
> also like to argue that, when a question comes
On 07.06.13 11:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> At least for the "substantial" part of your question I believe if a
> professional geo service provider like map box would decide to use OSM to
> satisfy its geocoding needs, it is obvious that this use would be
> "substantial", or you could use it on
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Olov McKie wrote:
> Geocoding and license implications
> Manual geocoding of an entity that a person has prior local knowledge of, is
> the same process as adding a new entity to the OSM, and as such the person
> geocoding the entity retains their full co
On 13/giu/2013, at 15:58, Olov McKie wrote:
> All other geocoding results in a Produced Work,
IMHO it results in a Derivative Database, as long as the amount of data
geocoded is not too small.
Cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-tal
On 13 June 2013 14:58, Olov McKie wrote:
> Manual geocoding
> A person using an OSM map to find the latitude and longitude coordinates
> associated with a point or an area, normally by clicking, drawing or
> similarly marking where that point or area is on a map. As an example, the
> process of
2013/6/7 Alex Barth
>
> Over the past months, we've tried to get legal advice on this question.
> This is difficult as the lack of existing case law makes it hard to get
> official legal opinion on the document and the license is very complex. But
> here is what we have heard back informally:
>
>
On 7 June 2013 01:56, Alex Barth wrote:
> With two State of the Map conferences coming up now and plenty of
> opportunities for face time, I'd like to restart our conversation around
> clarifying the ODbL's implications for geocoding and get to a result. Over
> here at MapBox we're hoping to use O
2013/6/7 Alex Barth
> 2. The ODbL is too vague in the definition of its terms, requiring
> additional clarifications by licensor. This is most importantly the case
> around the terms "derivative database" and what constitutes a "substantial"
> extraction of data [3].
At least for the "substant
11 matches
Mail list logo
