Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License question, user clicking on map

2013-03-01 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 28/02/13 14:58, Olov McKie wrote: Hello All! Hi Olov, I'll give this a go. My answers are a long way down because I think cases 1-3 are all essentially the same: First off, thank you for the feedback I have gotten so far! I had an idea about what answers I would get on my questions,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] legal-talk Digest, Vol 78, Issue 10

2013-03-01 Thread Olov McKie
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 00:34:44 +0800 From: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com You're letting users pinpoint locations on a map created using OSM data. How is this different from tracing roads and buildings from a map created using OSM data? I think most people agree that such tracing indeed

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License question, user clicking on map

2013-03-01 Thread Alex Barth
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: The fact that you can’t mix OSM + proprietary data and then distribute it as some kind of “OSM but better” without releasing the proprietary data is a feature of share-alike licenses, not a bug. Not every feature is a good

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License question, user clicking on map

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Myers
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:36:48 -0500, Alex Barth wrote: On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Paul Norman wrote: The fact that you can’t mix OSM + proprietary data and then distribute it as some kind of “OSM but better” without releasing the proprietary data is a feature of share-alike licenses,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License question, user clicking on map

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Myers
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:53:44 +0100 (CET), Olov McKie wrote: As I understand our license change, it can be described as this: (Please correct me if I am wrong) All objects that had an edit history where someone not willing to change the license (decliner) had edited anything was reverted back